...
首页> 外文期刊>Assistive technology: the official journal of RESNA >Speech Recognition for Environmental Control: Effect of Microphone Type, Dysarthria, and Severity on Recognition Results
【24h】

Speech Recognition for Environmental Control: Effect of Microphone Type, Dysarthria, and Severity on Recognition Results

机译:用于环境控制的语音识别:麦克风类型,构音障碍和严重程度对识别结果的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examines the use of commercially available automatic speech recognition (ASR) across microphone options as access to environmental control for individuals with and without dysarthria. A study of two groups of speakers (typical speech and dysarthria), was conducted to understand their performance using ASR and various microphones for environmental control. Specifically, dependent variables examined included attempts per command, recognition accuracy, frequency of error type, and perceived workload. A further sub-analysis of the group of participants with dysarthria examined the impact of severity. Results indicated a significantly larger number of attempts were required (P = 0.007), and significantly lower recognition accuracies were achieved by the dysarthric participants (P = 0.010). A sub-analysis examining severity demonstrated no significant differences between the typical speakers and participants with mild dysarthria. However, significant differences were evident (P = 0.007, P = 0.008) between mild and moderate-severe dysarthric participants. No significant differences existed across microphones. A higher frequency of threshold errors occurred for typical participants and no response errors for moderate-severe dysarthrics. There were no significant differences on the NASA Task Load Index.
机译:这项研究研究了跨麦克风选项的市售自动语音识别(ASR)的使用,为患有和不患有构音障碍的个人提供环境控制。进行了两组说话者(典型言语和构音障碍)的研究,以了解他们使用ASR和各种麦克风进行环境控制的性能。具体来说,检查的因变量包括每个命令的尝试次数,识别准确性,错误类型的频率以及可感知的工作量。对构音障碍参与者的进一步分项分析检查了严重程度的影响。结果表明,需要进行大量尝试(P = 0.007),并且构想障碍参与者获得的识别准确性明显较低(P = 0.010)。一项对严重程度进行亚分析的研究表明,典型的说话者与轻度构音障碍的参与者之间没有显着差异。但是,轻度和中度重度构音障碍参与者之间存在明显差异(P = 0.007,P = 0.008)。麦克风之间没有显着差异。典型参与者的阈值错误发生频率更高,中度至重度运动障碍者无反应错误。 NASA任务负荷指数没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号