...
首页> 外文期刊>Brain injury: BI >Community integration following TBI: an examination of community integration measures within the ICF framework.
【24h】

Community integration following TBI: an examination of community integration measures within the ICF framework.

机译:TBI之后的社区融合:在ICF框架内检查社区融合措施。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The objectives of the present study are (1) to examine whether the content of existing community integration measures used following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is represented in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and (2) to determine if the ICF provides a reasonable framework within which such measurement tools may be compared. METHOD: Five commonly-used assessment instruments were selected for inclusion. Independent raters mapped identified measurement concepts to the ICF using established linking rules. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-five concepts were identified from 85 items in five scales. Of these more than 75% could be linked to the ICF. The majority of linked concepts were assigned to 64 categories within the activities and participation component of the ICF; however, the focus of assessment within each instrument varied considerably. CONCLUSION: Through a standardized process of item mapping to the ICF, one may examine operationalizations of community integration. This may help inform selection of a method of assessment appropriate to both the subject population and clinical or research purpose. However, this process allows comparison of only the objective content of measurement tools. Subjective evaluations may also be necessary to provide comprehensive assessment of community integration.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是(1)检查创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后使用的现有社区融合措施的内容是否在国际功能,残疾与健康分类(ICF)中得到体现,以及(2)确定ICF是否提供了可以比较这些衡量工具的合理框架。方法:选择五种常用评估工具进行纳入。独立评估者使用已建立的链接规则将已识别的度量概念映射到ICF。结果:从五个量表的85个项目中确定了185个概念。其中有超过75%可能与ICF相关。在ICF的活动和参与部分中,大多数链接的概念被分配到64个类别;但是,每种文书的评估重点相差很大。结论:通过一种将项目映射到ICF的标准化过程,人们可以检查社区整合的运作情况。这可以帮助告知选择适合于对象人群和临床或研究目的的评估方法。但是,此过程仅允许比较测量工具的客观内容。为了对社区融合进行全面评估,可能还需要进行主观评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号