...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Level of Clinical Evidence Presented at the Arthroscopy Association of North America Annual Meeting Over 10 Years (2006-2015)
【24h】

Level of Clinical Evidence Presented at the Arthroscopy Association of North America Annual Meeting Over 10 Years (2006-2015)

机译:十年来在北美关节镜协会年度会议上发表的临床证据水平(2006-2015年)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate any trends in the level of clinical evidence in the papers presented at the Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA) annual scientific meetings from 2006 to 2015. Methods: The online abstracts of the paper presentations presented at the AANA meetings were independently evaluated by 2 reviewers (664 total presentations). The reviewers independently screened these results for clinical studies and graded their level of evidence from Level I (i.e., randomized trials) to IV (i.e., case series) based on the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons classification system. Results: Five hundred thirteen presentations met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Overall, 16% of the presentations were Level I evidence, 15% were Level II, 26% were Level III, and 43% were Level IV. We observed a significant non-random improvement in the level of evidence of presentations at the AANA meetings (P <= .001) between 2006 and 2015. In particular, the percentage of papers with Level IV evidence presented significantly decreased (P <= .001) and the percentage of papers with Level III evidence increased (P = .004) over the study period. Conclusions: Statistical trends show that the influence of evidence-based medicine in orthopaedics has had a positive impact on the quality of research presented at the AANA meetings.
机译:目的:评估2006年至2015年在北美关节镜协会(AANA)年度科学会议上发表的论文中临床证据水平的任何趋势。方法:在AANA会议上发表的论文演示文稿的在线摘要是独立的由2位评论者进行了评估(总共664条演讲)。审查者独立筛选这些结果用于临床研究,并根据美国骨科医师学会分类系统将其证据等级从I级(即随机试验)分级为IV级(即病例系列)。结果:513份报告符合纳入标准并进行了评估。总体而言,16%的演示文稿属于I级证据,15%为II级证据,26%为III级证据,43%为IV级证据。我们观察到2006年至2015年间,在AANA会议上的陈述证据水平显着非随机改善(P <= .001)。特别是,具有IV级证据的论文百分比显着下降(P <=。 001),并且在研究期间,具有III级证据的论文的百分比增加了(P = .004)。结论:统计趋势表明,循证医学对骨科的影响对AANA会议上提出的研究质量产生了积极影响。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号