...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, D. Atmospheres: JGR >The use of satellite-measured aerosol optical depth to constrain biomass burning emissions source strength in the global model GOCART
【24h】

The use of satellite-measured aerosol optical depth to constrain biomass burning emissions source strength in the global model GOCART

机译:satellite-measured气溶胶光学的使用深度限制生物质燃烧排放源的力量在全球模型手推车

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

[1] Simulations of biomass burning (BB) emissions in chemistry transport models strongly depend on the inventories that define emission source location and strength. We use 13 global biomass burning emission estimates, including the widely used Global Fire Emission Database (GFED) monthly and daily versions, Fire Radiative Power (FRP)-based Quick Fire Emission Data set QFED, and 11 calculated emissions from different combinations of burned area based on the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) products, effective fuel load, and species emission factors as alternative inputs to the global Goddard Chemistry Aerosol Radiation and Transport (GOCART) model. The resultant simulated aerosol optical depth (AOD) and its spatial distribution are compared to AOD snapshots measured by the MODIS instrument for 124 fire events occurring between 2006 and 2007. This comparison exposes the regional biases of each emission option. GOCART average fire AOD values compare best to MODIS-measured AOD when the daily GFED inventory is used as input to GOCART. Even though GFED-based emission options provide the lowest emissions in the tropics, GFED-based GOCART AOD compares best with MODIS AOD in tropical cases. Fire-counts-based emission options give the largest emission estimates in the boreal regions, and the model performs best at higher latitudes with these inputs when compared to MODIS. Comparison of total annual BB emissions by all inventories suggests that burned area estimates are usually the largest source of disagreement. It is also shown that the quantitative relationship between BB aerosol emission rate and model-simulated AOD is related to the horizontal plume dispersion, which can be approximated by the wind speed in the planetary boundary layer in most cases. Thus, given average wind speed of the smoke plume environment, MODIS-measured AOD can provide a constraint to the strength of BB sources at the level of individual plumes.
机译:[1]模拟生物质燃烧(BB)排放强烈依赖于化学传输模型库存定义排放源位置和强度。燃烧排放估计,包括广泛每月使用全球火灾排放数据库(gf)和日常版本,火焰辐射能力火(FRP)的快速排放数据集压,和11个计算排放量不同基于适度的组合燃烧区域分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)产品、有效的载油量和物种排放因素替代的输入全球戈达德气溶胶辐射和化学运输(手推车)模型。气溶胶光学厚度(AOD)和它的空间分布比较大气气溶胶快照124年MODIS测量的仪器事件发生在2006年和2007年之间。比较暴露的地区偏见发射选项。比较最好MODIS-measured AOD日常gf库存作为输入使用手推车。尽管GFED-based发射选项提供在热带地区碳排放最低GFED-based手推车与MODIS气溶胶在大气气溶胶比较最好热带的病例。选择给最大的排放估计北方地区,执行最好的模型在高纬度地区,这些输入的时候而MODIS。所有的库存都表明燃烧排放区域通常估计的最大来源分歧。BB气溶胶之间定量关系发射率和模型模拟大气气溶胶是相关的可以水平羽色散近似的风速行星在大多数情况下边界层。烟雾环境的风速,MODIS-measured大气气溶胶可以提供一个约束BB的力量的来源个人的羽毛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号