首页> 外文期刊>Bone marrow transplantation >A prospective comparison of immune reconstitution in pediatric recipients of positively selected CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells from unrelated donors vs recipients of unmanipulated bone marrow from related donors.
【24h】

A prospective comparison of immune reconstitution in pediatric recipients of positively selected CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells from unrelated donors vs recipients of unmanipulated bone marrow from related donors.

机译:前瞻性比较来自无关供体的阳性选择的CD34 +外周血干细胞的儿科接受者与来自相关供体的未操纵的骨髓的接受者的免疫重建。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Positively selected CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells from unrelated donors (UD-HSCT) have been successfully transplanted, but little is known about immune reconstitution in this setting. Here we report a prospective comparison of immune reconstitution in recipients of UD-HSCT and of unmanipulated bone marrow from matched sibling donors (MSD-BMT). T-cell reconstitution occurred more than 100 days later in the UD-HSCT than in the MSD-BMT group. The first T cells after UD-HSCT were almost exclusively CD45RO(+) HLA-DR(+), whereas early-emerging T cells after MSD-BMT more frequently expressed CD62L, CD28, and CD25. In both groups, numbers of CD45RA(+) naive T cells increased after 180 days. After UD-HSCT, the T-cell-receptor (TCR)-repertoire was severely skewed and showed significantly reduced diversity during the first year, but only minor abnormalities were seen after MSD-BMT. TCR-diversity increased simultaneously with the number of naive T cells. In both groups, we observed transient expansions of gammadelta T cells. B cells were reconstituted more rapidly in UD-HSCT than in MSD-BMT recipients, whereas the rapidity of NK-cell reconstitution was similar in the two groups. In summary, T-cell reconstitution was slower after UD-HSCT than after MSD-BMT because of the delayed recovery of early memory-type T cells with reduced TCR-diversity, whereas naive T-, NK-, and B cells were reconstituted similarly in the two groups.
机译:来自无关供体(UD-HSCT)的阳性选择的CD34(+)造血干细胞已成功移植,但在这种情况下对免疫重建的了解很少。在这里我们报告前瞻性比较UD-HSCT的收件人和匹配的兄弟姐妹供体(MSD-BMT)的未操纵的骨髓中的免疫重建。与MSD-BMT组相比,UD-HSCT中T细胞重建发生的时间晚了100天。 UD-HSCT之后的第一个T细胞几乎完全是CD45RO(+)HLA-DR(+),而MSD-BMT之后的早期T细胞更频繁地表达CD62L,CD28和CD25。在两组中,180天后CD45RA(+)幼稚T细胞的数量均增加。 UD-HSCT后,T细胞受体(TCR)的库在第一年严重偏斜并显示出多样性的显着降低,但MSD-BMT后仅观察到少量异常。 TCR多样性随着幼稚T细胞数量的增加而增加。在两组中,我们都观察到了γδT细胞的瞬时扩增。在UD-HSCT中,B细胞的重建速度比在MSD-BMT受体中的重建速度更快,而两组中NK细胞重建的速度相似。总之,UD-HSCT后的T细胞重构比MSD-BMT慢,这是因为早期记忆型T细胞的恢复延迟,TCR多样性降低,而幼稚的T-,NK-和B细胞重构相似。在两组中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号