首页> 外文期刊>Bone marrow transplantation >Fotemustine plus etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan (FEAM) as a new conditioning regimen for lymphoma patients undergoing auto-SCT: a multicenter feasibility study.
【24h】

Fotemustine plus etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan (FEAM) as a new conditioning regimen for lymphoma patients undergoing auto-SCT: a multicenter feasibility study.

机译:替莫司汀加依托泊苷,阿糖胞苷和美法仑(FEAM)作为接受auto-SCT的淋巴瘤患者的新调理方案:一项多中心可行性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BEAM is a widely used conditioning regimen for relapsed/refractory lymphoma patients undergoing auto-SCT. We conducted a multicenter study with an alternative regimen (fotemustine plus etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan (FEAM)) in which BCNU was substituted by the chloroethylnitrosourea fotemustine (FTM). Eighty-four patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin's (n=20) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=64) were conditioned with a FEAM regimen (FTM 150 mg/m(2) on days -7, -6, etoposide 200 mg/m(2) and cytarabine 400 mg/m(2) on days -5, -4, -3, -2 and melphalan 140 mg/m(2) on day -1). Patients were evaluated for toxicity and engraftment parameters. Median times to neutrophil (>500 x 10(9)/l) and plt (>20 000 x 10(9)/l) engraftment were 11 and 13 days, respectively. Grade 3 mucositis occurred in 19 patients (23%), while G3 nausea/vomiting and G3 diarrhea were observed in 13 (15%) and 6 (7%) patients, respectively. No severe hepatic, renal or pulmonary toxicity was detected. Seven patients (7%) experienced G4 mucositis, while no other G4 toxicities or unexpected adverse events of any grade were recorded. Transplant-related mortality was 2.4%. We conclude that a FEAM regimen is feasible and safe. Although toxicity and engraftment times compared favorably with BEAM, longer follow-up is needed to evaluate fully its efficacy and long-term safety.
机译:BEAM是接受自动SCT的复发/难治性淋巴瘤患者的一种广泛使用的调理方案。我们进行了一项多中心研究,采用了另一种治疗方案(福莫汀+依托泊苷,阿糖胞苷和美法仑(FEAM)),其中BCNU被氯乙基亚硝基脲替莫司汀(FTM)替代。对84例复发/难治性霍奇金淋巴瘤(n = 20)和非霍奇金淋巴瘤(n = 64)的患者在第-7,-6天采用FEAM方案(FTM 150 mg / m(2))进行调理,依托泊苷200 mg / m(2)和阿糖胞苷400 mg / m(2)在第-5,-4,-3,-2天和美法仑140 mg / m(2)在第-1天)。对患者的毒性和植入参数进行了评估。中性粒细胞植入的中位数时间(> 500 x 10(9)/ l)和plt(> 20,000 x 10(9)/ l)的中位时间分别为11天和13天。 19例患者(3%)发生了3级粘膜炎,而13例患者(15%)和6例患者(7%)发生了G3恶心/呕吐和G3腹泻。没有发现严重的肝,肾或肺毒性。 7名患者(7%)经历了G4粘膜炎,而未记录到其他G4毒性或任何级别的意外不良事件。移植相关死亡率为2.4%。我们得出结论,有限元方法是可行且安全的。尽管毒性和植入时间比BEAM有利,但需要更长的随访时间来全面评估其疗效和长期安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号