...
首页> 外文期刊>JDR clinical and translational research. >Platelet Concentrate Treatments for Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
【24h】

Platelet Concentrate Treatments for Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

机译:血小板浓缩液治疗颞下颌紊乱:系统回顾和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: This systematic review compared platelet concentrates (PCs) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) or saline/Ringer’s solution injections as treatments of temporomandibular osteoarthritis and disc displacement in terms of pain and maximum mouth opening (MMO). Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched up to March 6, 2020. Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Exclusion criteria were case series, observational studies, animal studies, and reviews. The Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The weighted mean difference was used to compare the results. Results: Nine RCTs were included with a total of 407 patients. The numbers of joints treated were 262, 112, and 112 in the PC, HA, and saline groups, respectively. The quality of studies was rated as strong in 4 studies, moderate in 4 studies, and weak in 1 study. The meta-analysis revealed that PCs decreased pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores compared to HA by an average of ?1.11 (CI, ?1.62 to ?0.60; P < 0.0001) and ?0.57 (CI, ?1.55 to 0.41; P = 0.26) at 3 and 12 mo follow-up respectively. Also, the average decrease in pain scores with PC compared to saline was ?1.33 (CI, ?2.61 to ?0.06; P = 0.04), ?2.07 (CI, ?3.46 to ?0.69; P = 0.003), and ?2.71 (CI, ?4.69 to ?0.72; P = 0.008) at 3, 6, and 12 mo, respectively. Regarding MMO measurements, PC was comparable to HA, but it was significantly better than saline after 3 and 6 mo [2.9 mm (CI,1.47 to 4.3; P < 0.0001), and 1.69 mm (CI, 0.13 to 3.25; P = 0.03) respectively]. Conclusion: PC reduces pain VAS scores compared to HA during the first 3 m after treatment, and when compared to saline, it reduces pain and increases MMO for longer durations. However, due to differences between groups regarding PC preparation protocols and study heterogeneity, further standardized RCTs are required. Knowledge Transfer Statement: This study provides researchers and clinicians with quantitative and qualitative analyses of the current evidence regarding the clinical outcomes of platelet concentrate injections in the treatment of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis and disc displacement in terms of pain control and maximum mouth opening.
机译:目标:系统回顾比较血小板浓缩液(pc)和透明质酸酸(HA)或生理盐水/林格氏溶液注射颞下颌关节炎的治疗和阀瓣和位移的痛苦最大的嘴打开(MMO)。科克兰,斯高帕斯被搜索到3月6日,2020. 相关的试验。系列、观察性研究、动物实验,和评论。项目(EPHPP)质量评估工具使用包括评估偏差的风险研究。比较结果。共有407名患者。多的关节治疗是262、112和112在个人电脑,哈,和生理盐水组,分别。研究的质量被评为4强4研究研究,温和,弱在1研究。减少疼痛视觉模拟量表(血管)分数1.11公顷平均相比呢? (CI, 1.62? 0.60;0.41;分别。分数与PC相比,盐水? 1.33 (CI,2.61 ? 0.06;0.69;P = 0.008), 3、6和12个月,分别。关于MMO测量,电脑相媲美哈,但它明显优于生理盐水3至6个月后(2.9毫米(CI, 1.47 - 4.3;0.0001),和1.69毫米(CI, 0.13 - 3.25;分别)。分数比HA在第一次3 m治疗,当盐水相比,它减少痛苦和增加MMO更长时间持续时间。关于电脑准备协议和组研究异构性,进一步标准化相关的是必需的。研究提供了研究人员和临床医生定量和定性的分析现有的证据有关的临床结果浓缩血小板注射的治疗颞下颌关节骨关节炎和阀瓣位移的疼痛控制和最大的嘴巴打开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号