...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied stochastic models in business and industry >'The usefulness of Bayesian optimal designs for discrete choice experiments' by R. Kessels, B. Jones, P. Goos and M. Vandebroek
【24h】

'The usefulness of Bayesian optimal designs for discrete choice experiments' by R. Kessels, B. Jones, P. Goos and M. Vandebroek

机译:R. Kessels,B。Jones,P。Goos和M. Vandebroek的“贝叶斯最优设计对离散选择实验的有用性”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

'Experimental design is perhaps the most important aspect of Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) as this determines what model(s) can be estimated with what levels of precision'. Never have truer words been so misunderstood, not by Kessels et al. but rather by many of those who do not fully understand or appreciate the message and meaning of their work. For those of us researching in this area, we would like to assume that the above sentiment is indeed the case and that designs do matter. Fortunately for us, the theory quite clearly and definitively supports that this is the case and happily, much empirical evidence also exists that suggests that the theory does indeed translate beyond the realm of simulated data. As both Louviere and Lanscar and Kessels et al. rightfully point out, experimental designs are generated under certain assumptions and depending upon what assumptions are made, the observed outcomes from the experiment may be influenced in very much unexpected ways. Indeed, one such way is the precision of the resulting parameter estimates obtained from the designs used in practice.
机译:“实验设计可能是离散选择实验(DCE)的最重要方面,因为它决定了可以以何种精度水平估算哪些模型”。从来没有像Kessels等人这样误解过真实的话。而是许多不完全理解或欣赏其工作的信息和意义的人。对于我们这方面的研究人员,我们想假设上述观点确实如此,而设计确实很重要。对我们来说幸运的是,该理论非常清楚地并明确地支持了这种情况,并且令人高兴的是,还存在许多经验证据,表明该理论确实的确超出了模拟数据的范围。正如Louviere和Lanscar和Kessels等人所说。正确地指出,实验设计是在某些假设下生成的,并且根据所做的假设,实验观察到的结果可能会以非常出乎意料的方式受到影响。实际上,一种方法是从实践中使用的设计获得的结果参数估计值的精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号