首页> 外文期刊>Applied Geography >Fire incidence in metropolitan areas: A comparative study of Brisbane (Australia) and Cardiff (United Kingdom)
【24h】

Fire incidence in metropolitan areas: A comparative study of Brisbane (Australia) and Cardiff (United Kingdom)

机译:大都市地区的火灾发生:布里斯班(澳大利亚)和加的夫(英国)的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In our previous research we applied spatial statistics and regression analysis to explore the relationships between the types of socio-economic factors that are associated with different fire incident types for an area of South Wales, UK. In this paper, we extend this analysis by using a comparative approach applying regression analysis to examine intra-urban trends in fire incidence using the case studies of Brisbane (Australia) and Cardiff (United Kingdom). Whilst drawing attention to the problems faced by researchers using spatial data in comparative contexts, this has revealed some important similarities and differences in associations, for example in relation to the residential patterns of the two cities which is reflective of their respective wider urban geography. We conclude by demonstrating the differences in trends between Cardiff and Brisbane and by highlighting outcomes from this research that are of relevance to policy makers in urban contexts. The latter could include for example those charged with identifying high risk communities, designing possible intervention strategies such as safety campaigns or with implementing educational programmes.
机译:在我们以前的研究中,我们应用了空间统计和回归分析来探讨与英国南威尔士地区不同火灾类型相关的社会经济因素类型之间的关系。在本文中,我们通过使用布里斯班(澳大利亚)和卡迪夫(英国)的案例研究,采用回归分析的比较方法,对城市内部发生火灾的趋势进行分析,从而扩展了这一分析范围。在提请研究人员在比较环境中使用空间数据时面临的问题的同时,这揭示了协会之间的一些重要相似点和不同点,例如与两个城市的居住模式有关,这反映了它们各自更广阔的城市地理环境。最后,我们将通过演示加的夫和布里斯班之间的趋势差异,并强调此研究的结果与城市背景下的政策制定者相关的结论。后者可以包括负责确定高危社区,设计可能的干预策略(例如安全运动)或实施教育计划的人员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号