...
首页> 外文期刊>Antiviral chemistry & chemotherapy >Activities of oseltamivir and ribavirin used alone and in combination against infections in mice with recent isolates of influenza A (H1N1) and B viruses.
【24h】

Activities of oseltamivir and ribavirin used alone and in combination against infections in mice with recent isolates of influenza A (H1N1) and B viruses.

机译:单独使用或联合使用的奥司他韦和利巴韦林对最近分离出的甲型流感病毒(H1N1)和乙型病毒感染小鼠的活性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mouse models have been widely used for evaluating potential influenza virus inhibitors. However, the viral strains traditionally used in these models are fairly old and do not represent currently circulating viruses in nature. We developed two new lethal infection models in mice using mouse-adapted influenza A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1) and influenza B/Sichuan/379/99 viruses. Both virus infections were used to study oral treatment with oseltamivir and ribavirin, both alone and in combination. Oral treatments were given twice daily for 5 days starting 4 h before infection in initial studies. Against influenza A, oseltamivir was active at 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg/day, protected 80-100% of mice from death and reduced lung consolidation - ribavirin was similarly effective at 20, 40, and 80 mg/kg/day. When treatments were initiated after virus challenge, delaying treatment with oseltamivir even 1 day caused it to be ineffective. Ribavirin prevented mortality by 50-80% when treatments were delayed 1-4 days afterinfection. The combination of the two drugs (oseltamivir at 20 mg/kg/day and ribavirin at 40 mg/kg/day) was no better than ribavirin alone. In contrast to what we observed with influenza A virus infections, oseltamivir and ribavirin showed similar dose-related antiviral activities against influenza B virus infections. The compounds both significantly increased survival when treatments started up to 4 days after infection, but ribavirin was more active than oseltamivir (50-80% survival compared to 30-40% survival, respectively, when starting treatments on days 2-4 after infection). By varying the doses of each drug that were used in combination (oseltamivir at 1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg/day; ribavirin at 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg/day) certain dosage combinations were superior to either compound used alone as assessed by decreased mortality, lung virus titre, lung score and lung weight parameters. These activities differed from published results with older, more established virus strains as oseltamivir was less effective and ribavirin was more active than previously reported.
机译:小鼠模型已被广泛用于评估潜在的流感病毒抑制剂。但是,传统上在这些模型中使用的病毒株年代久远,并不代表自然界中当前正在传播的病毒。我们使用适应小鼠的A型流感/新喀里多尼亚/ 20/99(H1N1)和B型流感/四川/ 379/99病毒开发了两种新的致死性小鼠感染模型。两种病毒感染均被用于研究单独或联合使用奥司他韦和利巴韦林的口服治疗。在初始研究中,从感染前4小时开始,每天两次口服治疗,共5天。对抗甲型流感,奥司他韦的活性为10、20和40 mg / kg /天,可保护80-100%的小鼠免于死亡并减少肺部固结-利巴韦林同样有效于20、40和80 mg / kg /天。当病毒攻击后开始治疗时,用奥司他韦延迟治疗甚至1天会使其无效。当治疗延迟至感染后1-4天时,利巴韦林可将死亡率降低50-80%。两种药物的组合(奥司他韦20 mg / kg /天和利巴韦林40 mg / kg /天)并不比单独使用利巴韦林好。与我们在甲型流感病毒感染中观察到的相反,奥司他韦和利巴韦林对乙型流感病毒感染表现出相似的剂量相关抗病毒活性。在感染后4天开始治疗时,两种化合物均可显着提高生存率,但利巴韦林比奥司他韦更具活性(在感染后2-4天开始治疗时,生存率分别为50-80%和30-40%生存率)。 。通过改变组合使用的每种药物的剂量(奥司他韦1.25、2.5和5 mg / kg /天;利巴韦林5、10和20 mg / kg /天),某些剂量组合优于单独使用的任何一种化合物。通过降低死亡率,肺部病毒滴度,肺部评分和肺部重量参数进行评估。这些活性不同于已发表的更老的病毒株的结果,因为奥司他韦的疗效较差,而利巴韦林的活性较先前报道的高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号