...
首页> 外文期刊>Blood Pressure Monitoring >Validation of two automatic devices: Omron HEM-7252G-HP and Omron HEM-7251G for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
【24h】

Validation of two automatic devices: Omron HEM-7252G-HP and Omron HEM-7251G for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010

机译:验证了两个自动设备:根据欧洲高血压学会国际协议修订版2010年进行血压自我测量的Omron HEM-7252G-HP和Omron HEM-7251G

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to validate the performance of Omron HEM-7252G-HP and Omron HEM-7251G for monitoring upper arm blood pressure (BP) in accordance with the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 (ESH-IP revision 2010).MethodsThree trained medical doctors validated the performance of these devices by comparing data obtained from these devices with those obtained using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer. We included 33 participants (19 men and 14 women for the experiment using HEM-7252G-HP; 16 men and 17 women for the experiment using HEM-7251G). The mean age of the participants was 5012 and 5310 years in the respective studies.ResultsThe percentages of test device-observer mercury sphygmomanometer BP differences within 5, 10, and 15mmHg were 76, 92, and 97% for systolic BP (SBP) and 83, 97, and 99% for diastolic BP (DBP), respectively, in the Omron HEM-7252G-HP and 77, 92, and 99% for SBP and 85, 94, and 98% for DBP, respectively, in the Omron HEM-7251G in the part 1 analysis; both SBP and DBP passed the part 1 and part 2 criteria.The mean differences between the device and mercury readings for SBP and DBP were as follows: HEM-7252G-HP, -1.5 +/- 5.1 and -1.2 +/- 3.9mmHg, respectively; HEM-7351G, -0.6 +/- 4.7 and -0.2 +/- 4.4mmHg, respectively.ConclusionThe Omron HEM-7252G-HP and HEM-7251G passed all the requirements of the ESH-IP 2010 revision.
机译:目的本研究的目的是根据欧洲高血压学会国际协议修订版2010(ESH-IP修订版2010)验证Omron HEM-7252G-HP和Omron HEM-7251G在监测上臂血压(BP)方面的性能方法三位训练有素的医生通过比较从这些设备获得的数据与使用标准汞血压计获得的数据来验证这些设备的性能。我们包括33名参与者(使用HEM-7252G-HP进行实验的19位男性和14位女性;使用HEM-7251G进行实验的16位男性和17位女性)。在各自的研究中,参与者的平均年龄分别为5012和5310岁。结果收缩压(SBP)和83的5、10和15mmHg之内的测试设备观察者汞血压计BP差异分别为76%,92%和97%在Omron HEM-7252G-HP中,舒张压BP(DBP)分别为97%和99%,在Omron HEM中分别为SBP分别为77%,92%和99%和DBP的85%,94%和98%第1部分中的-7251G; SBP和DBP均通过了第1部分和第2部分标准.SBP和DBP的设备读数和汞读数之间的平均差异如下:HEM-7252G-HP,-1.5 +/- 5.1和-1.2 +/- 3.9mmHg , 分别; HEM-7351G,-0.6 +/- 4.7和-0.2 +/- 4.4mmHg。结论欧姆龙HEM-7252G-HP和HEM-7251G通过了ESH-IP 2010修订版的所有要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号