首页> 外文期刊>Annals of family medicine >Major depression symptoms in primary care and psychiatric care settings: a cross-sectional analysis.
【24h】

Major depression symptoms in primary care and psychiatric care settings: a cross-sectional analysis.

机译:初级保健和精神科医疗机构的主要抑郁症状:横断面分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: We undertook a study to confirm and extend preliminary findings that participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) in primary care and specialty care settings have with equivalent degrees of depression severity and an indistinguishable constellation of symptoms. METHODS: Baseline data were collected for a distinct validation cohort of 2,541 participants (42% primary care) from 14 US regional centers comprised of 41 clinic sites (18 primary care, 23 specialty care). Participants met broadly inclusive eligibility criteria requiring a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, diagnosis of MDD and a minimum depressive symptom score on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. The main outcome measures were the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology--Clinician Rated and the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire. RESULTS: Primary care and specialty care participants had identical levels of moderately severe depression and identical distributions of depressive severity scores. Both primary care and specialty care participants showed considerable suicide risk, with specialty care participants even more likely to report prior suicide attempts. Core depressive symptoms or concurrent psychiatric disorders were not substantially different between settings. One half of participants in each setting had an anxiety disorder (48.6% primary care vs 51.6% specialty care, P = .143), with social phobia being the most common (25.3% primary care vs 32.1% specialty care, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: For outpatients with nonpsychotic MDD, depressive symptoms and severity vary little between primary care and specialty care settings. In this large, broadly inclusive US sample, the risk factors for chronic and recurrent depressive illness were frequently present, highlighting a clear risk for treatment resistance and the need for aggressive management strategies in both settings.
机译:目的:我们进行了一项研究,以确认并扩展初步发现,即在初级保健和专科保健机构中患有重性抑郁症(MDD)的参与者具有同等程度的抑郁症严重程度,并且没有明显的症状。方法:收集了来自14个美国地区中心的2,541名参与者(42%的初级保健)的不同验证队列的基线数据,该地区中心包括41个诊所站点(18个初级保健,23个专科保健)。参与者符合广泛的入选标准,需要《精神障碍诊断和统计手册》第四版,MDD诊断和17个项的汉密尔顿抑郁量表上的最低抑郁症状评分。主要结局指标为抑郁症状的30项清单-临床医师评分和精神病学诊断筛查问卷。结果:初级保健和专科保健参与者的中度重度抑郁症水平相同,而抑郁严重程度得分分布相同。初级保健和特殊护理参与者均显示出相当大的自杀风险,而特殊护理参与者甚至更有可能报告先前的自杀尝试。设置之间的核心抑郁症状或并发的精神疾病没有实质性差异。每种情况下,有一半的参与者患有焦虑症(48.6%的初级保健vs. 51.6%的特殊保健,P = .143),社交恐惧症是最常见的(25.3%的初级保健vs 32.1%的特殊保健,P = 0.002)。 )。结论对于非精神病性MDD的门诊患者,抑郁症状和严重程度在初级保健和专科保健设置之间差异不大。在这个庞大的,广泛包容的美国样本中,经常存在慢性和复发性抑郁症的危险因素,突显了两种情况下明显的治疗耐药性风险和积极治疗策略的必要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号