首页> 外文期刊>Annals of family medicine >Exploring and validating patient concerns: relation to prescribing for depression.
【24h】

Exploring and validating patient concerns: relation to prescribing for depression.

机译:探索和验证患者的担忧:与处方抑郁症有关。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: This study examined moderating effects of physician communication behaviors on relationships between patient requests for antidepressant medications and subsequent prescribing. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Primary care physicians (N = 152) each had 1 or 2 unannounced visits from standardized patients portraying the role of major depression or adjustment disorder. Each standardized patient made brand-specific, general, or no requests for antidepressants. We coded covert visit audio recordings for physicians' exploration and validation of patient concerns (EVC). Effects of communication on prescribing (the main outcome) were evaluated using logistic regression analysis, accounting for clustering and for site, physician, and visit characteristics, and stratified by request type and standardized patient role. RESULTS: In the absence of requests, high-EVC visits were associated with higher rates of prescribing of antidepressants for major depression. In low-EVC visits, prescribing was driven by patient requests (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] for request vs no request = 43.54, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69-1,120.87; P < or = .005), not clinical indications (AOR for depression vs adjustment disorder = 1.82; 95% CI, 0.33-9.89; P = NS). In contrast, in high-EVC visits, prescribing was driven equally by requests (AOR = 4.02; 95% CI, 1.67-9.68; P < or = .005) and clinical indications (AOR = 4.70; 95% CI, 2.18-10.16; P < or = .005). More thorough history taking of depression symptoms did not mediate these results. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of care for depression is improved when patients participate more actively in the encounter and when physicians explore and validate patient concerns. Communication interventions to improve quality of care should target both physician and patient communication behaviors. Cognitive mechanisms that link patient requests and EVC to quality of care warrant further study.
机译:目的:本研究检查了医师沟通行为对患者抗抑郁药要求与后续处方之间关系的调节作用。方法:我们对随机试验进行了二次分析。初级保健医生(N = 152)每人接受1或2次来自标准患者的突击检查,这些患者表现出严重抑郁或适应障碍的作用。每个标准化患者均提出抗抑郁药的品牌特定要求,一般要求或没有要求。我们对秘密访问的音频进行了编码,以供医生探索和验证患者关注的问题(EVC)。使用逻辑回归分析评估沟通对处方(主要结果)的影响,并考虑聚类和地点,医师和就诊特征,并按请求类型和标准化患者角色进行分层。结果:在没有要求的情况下,高EVC访视与针对重度抑郁症的抗抑郁药开具更高的处方率有关。在低EVC访视中,处方是由患者请求决定的(请求与未请求的调整比值比[AOR] = 43.54,95%置信区间[CI],1.69-1,120.87; P <或= .005),而不是临床适应症(抑郁与适应障碍的AOR = 1.82; 95%CI,0.33-9.89; P = NS)。相比之下,在高EVC访视中,处方是由请求(AOR = 4.02; 95%CI,1.67-9.68; P <或= 0.005)和临床适应症(AOR = 4.70; 95%CI,2.18-10.16)共同驱动的。 ; P <或= 0.005)。抑郁症状的更全面病史并未介导这些结果。结论:当患者更积极地参与相遇以及医生探索并验证患者的担忧时,抑郁症的护理质量将得到改善。为提高护理质量而进行的交流干预应针对医生和患者的交流行为。将患者请求和EVC与护理质量相关联的认知机制值得进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号