首页> 外文期刊>Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences >Forensic Seismology and the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty
【24h】

Forensic Seismology and the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty

机译:法医地震学与《全面禁止核试验条约》

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One application of forensic seismology is to help verify, compliance with the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. One of the challenges Ewing the forensic seismologist is to discriminate between the many thousands of earthquakes of potential interest each and potential Treaty violations (underground explosions). There are four main methods: (a) ratio of body- to surface-wave magnitudes, (b) ratio of high-frequency P to S energy, (c) model-based methods, and (d) source depth. Methods (a) and (b) have all empirical basis. The weakness of methods (a)-(c) is the lack of an equivalent elastic source for,in underground explosion fired in the range of geological media found around the world. Reliable routine source-depth determination has proved difficult. However, experience gained in the past decade at identifying suspicious seismic sources suggests that although no single method works all of the time, intelligent and original application of complementary methods is usually sufficient to satisfactorily identify the source in question.
机译:法医地震学的一种应用是帮助验证是否符合《全面禁止核试验条约》。尤因法医地震学家的挑战之一是要区分成千上万的潜在潜在地震和潜在的违反《条约》(地下爆炸)。主要有四种方法:(a)体波与表面波幅度之比;(b)高频P与S能量之比;(c)基于模型的方法;以及(d)源深。方法(a)和(b)具有所有经验依据。方法(a)-(c)的缺点是,在世界各地发现的一系列地质介质中进行地下爆炸时,缺乏等效的弹性源。事实证明,可靠的常规源深度确定很困难。但是,过去十年来在识别可疑地震源方面的经验表明,尽管没有一种方法一直都能奏效,但对互补方法的明智而原始的应用通常足以令人满意地识别出所讨论的震源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号