...
首页> 外文期刊>Annual Review of Public Health >Advertising of prescription-only medicines to the public: does evidence of benefit counterbalance harm?
【24h】

Advertising of prescription-only medicines to the public: does evidence of benefit counterbalance harm?

机译:向公众宣传仅处方药:利益平衡的证据是否有害?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since the global withdrawal of rofecoxib (Vioxx) in 2004, concerns about public health effects of direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) have grown. A systematic review of the research evidence on behavioral, health, and cost effects, published in 2005, found four studies meeting inclusion criteria, which showed that DTCA increases prescribing volume and patient demand, and shifts prescribing. From 2005 to 2010, nine studies met similar criteria. These largely confirm previous results. Additional effects include a shift to less appropriate prescribing, differential effects by patient price sensitivity and drug type, switches to less cost-effective treatment, and sustained sales despite a price increase. Claimed effects on adherence do not stand up to scrutiny and are based mainly on negative trials. There is no evidence of improved treatment quality or early provision of needed care. If policy is to be informed by evidence, the strength of research methods and ability to assess causality need to be considered.
机译:自2004年罗非考昔(Vioxx)在全球范围内撤出以来,对直接面向消费者的广告(DTCA)的公共健康影响的关注日益增加。在2005年发表的关于行为,健康和成本影响的研究证据的系统综述发现,有四项符合入选标准的研究表明DTCA增加了处方量和患者需求,并且改变了处方。从2005年到2010年,有9项研究符合类似标准。这些在很大程度上证实了先前的结果。其他影响包括改用不合适的处方,患者对价格的敏感性和药物类型的不同影响,转向成本效益较低的治疗方法,以及尽管价格上涨但销售持续。声称对依从性的影响无法接受严格的审查,并且主要基于阴性试验。没有证据表明可以改善治疗质量或及早提供所需的护理。如果政策要以证据为依据,则需要考虑研究方法的实力和评估因果关系的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号