...
首页> 外文期刊>Animal Feed Science and Technology >Differences between domestic herbivores species in alkane faecal recoveries and the accuracy of subsequent estimates of diet composition
【24h】

Differences between domestic herbivores species in alkane faecal recoveries and the accuracy of subsequent estimates of diet composition

机译:食草动物种类在烷烃粪便回收方面的差异与日后饮食组成估计的准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study aimed to evaluate effects of animal species on faecal recovery of n-alkane markers. In addition, impacts of using different sets of alkane faecal recoveries on diet composition estimates was assessed. Six mature crossbred mares (383pl59kg live weight (LW)), six adult cows (500pl72kg LW) of Asturiana de los Valles breed, eight Cashmere does (29pl5kg LW) and eight crossbreed ewes (30pl5kg LW) were used. Animals were housed in individual stalls and randomly assigned to one of two diets composed of herbage (D1) or herbage plus heather (D2) (3 animals per diet in the equine and cattle groups and 4 animals per diet in the goat and sheep groups). Diet composition was estimated from alkane concentrations (i.e., C-C) in diets and faeces by least-squares procedures. Alkane faecal recovery (AFR) was incomplete and increased (P<0.001) linearly with carbon chain length in all animal species. Animal species had an effect on faecal recovery of all alkanes, with equines having the highest recovery and goats the lowest. Differences in AFR between equines and ruminant species were higher for the shorter chain alkanes and tended to decrease with increased of carbon chain length. Within ruminant species, cattle had, in general, the highest faecal recovery for all alkanes indicating a lower level of disappearance of these markers in the digestive tract of cattle. The AFR set used in diet composition calculations affected (P<0.05) the estimated proportions of all plant species in both diets. Utilization of uncorrected faecal alkane concentrations (AFR0) provided the poorest estimates of diet composition, and use of mean faecal recovery data of the dietary treatment (AFR1) yielded the most accurate. Results show that application of a general set of alkane faecal recoveries (AFR2) results in estimates of diet composition which distinguish less well between diet components with similar alkane profiles.
机译:这项研究旨在评估动物物种对正构烷烃标志物粪便恢复的影响。此外,评估了使用不同组的烷烃粪便回收率对饮食组成估计的影响。使用了六头成熟的杂种母马(383pl59kg活重(LW)),六头成年母牛(500pl72kg体重),Asturiana de los Valles品种,八头Cashmere母羊(29pl5kg LW)和八头杂种母羊(30pl5kg LW)。将动物圈养在单独的摊位中,并随机分配给由草料(D1)或草料加希瑟(D2)组成的两种日粮中的一种(马和牛组中每种日粮3只动物,山羊和绵羊组中每种日粮4只动物) 。通过最小二乘法从饮食和粪便中的烷烃浓度(即C-C)估算饮食组成。在所有动物物种中,烷烃的粪便回收率(AFR)不完全,并且随着碳链长度线性增加(P <0.001)。动物物种对所有烷烃的粪便回收率都有影响,马的回收率最高,而山羊的回收率最低。对于短链烷烃,马和反刍动物之间的AFR差异较高,并且随着碳链长度的增加趋于减小。在反刍动物中,一般而言,牛对所有烷烃的粪便回收率最高,表明这些标记在牛的消化道中消失的水平较低。在饮食组成计算中使用的AFR集会影响(P <0.05)两种饮食中所有植物物种的估计比例。未校正的粪便链烷烃浓度(AFR0)的使用对饮食组成的估计最差,而饮食治疗的平均粪便恢复数据(AFR1)的使用最为准确。结果表明,应用一套通用的烷烃粪便回收率(AFR2)可以估算出饮食组成,从而在具有相似烷烃特征的饮食成分之间难以区分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号