AbstractTextbook vetting and evaluation process intends to ensure that the materials provided are rele'/> An Investigation of Textbook Vetting and Evaluation Process in Tanzania
首页> 外文期刊>Publishing research quarterly >An Investigation of Textbook Vetting and Evaluation Process in Tanzania
【24h】

An Investigation of Textbook Vetting and Evaluation Process in Tanzania

机译:坦桑尼亚教科书审查与评价过程的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AbstractTextbook vetting and evaluation process intends to ensure that the materials provided are relevant, of the required quality, suitable ad would enhance learning efficiency and effectiveness. The paper investigates the role of publishers and Tanzania Institute of Education (TIE) in the textbooks vetting and evaluation process; examines factors used to vet, evaluate and approve primary and secondary school textbooks in Tanzania and proposes Strategies that would enhance the textbook vetting, evaluation and process. The study used a mixed method research design. Respondents were selected educational publishers; MoEVT, Baraza la Kiswahili Tanzania, TIE, and Publishers Association of Tanzania. Questionnaire and semi- structured interview were used to collect data which were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively. Major findings of the study were; textbooks vetting and evaluation process is not professionally conducted although standard criteria have been established; there is not well established roles among key players involved in the vetting and evaluation process leading to conflict of interest between TIE and the publishers. The study recommends establishing an independent professional evaluation board and a well-defined timetable and effective communication among various players; enacting a book policy and adopting a limited multiple-textbook publishing system.]]>
机译:Abstract教科书审查和评估过程旨在确保所提供的材料具有相关性、所需的质量、合适的广告将提高学习效率和有效性。本文调查了出版商和坦桑尼亚教育学院(TIE)的作用在教科书审查和评估过程中;审查坦桑尼亚中小学教科书审查、评估和批准的因素,并提出加强教科书审查、评估和批准过程的策略。本研究采用混合研究设计方法。受访者被选为教育出版商;MoEVT、Baraza la Kiswahili坦桑尼亚、TIE和坦桑尼亚出版商协会。采用问卷调查和半结构式访谈的方法收集数据,并进行定性和定量分析。该研究的主要发现包括:;虽然已经建立了标准标准,但教科书审查和评估过程没有专业化;在审查和评估过程中,关键参与者之间没有明确的角色,导致TIE和出版商之间的利益冲突。该研究建议建立一个独立的专业评估委员会,制定明确的时间表,并在各个参与者之间进行有效沟通;制定图书政策,实行有限的多册教材出版制度]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号