首页> 外文期刊>Behavioural Brain Research: An International Journal >Variation in visual acuity within pigmented, and between pigmented and albino rat strains
【24h】

Variation in visual acuity within pigmented, and between pigmented and albino rat strains

机译:有色大鼠以及有色和白化病品系之间的视力变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many researchers assume that laboratory rats have poor vision, and accordingly, that they need not consider differences in the visual function of rats as a consequence of strain or experience. Currently, it is not specifically known whether rat domestication has negatively affected the visual function of laboratory rat strains, what the effects of strain albinism are on rat visual function, or whether there are strain differences in the visual function of laboratory rats that are independent of pigmentation. In order to address these questions, we measured psychophysically the vertical grating acuity of three pigmented (Dark Agouti, Fisher -Norway, Long-Evans) and three albino (Fisher-344, Sprague-Dawley, Wistar) strains of laboratory rats, and compared their acuity with that of wild rats. The grating thresholds of Dark Agouti, Long-Evans and wild strains clustered around 1.0 cycle/degree (c/d) and did not significantly differ from one another. Fisher-Norway rats, however, had a significantly higher threshold of 1.5 c/d. The grating thresholds of Fisher-344, Sprague-Dawley, and Wistar strains, which were clustered around 0.5 c/d, were significantly lower than those of the pigmented strains. These data demonstrate that there is significant strain variability in the visual function of laboratory rats. Domestication of Long-Evans and Dark Agouti strains does not appear to have compromised visual acuity, but in the case of Fisher-Norway rats, selective breeding may have enhanced their acuity. Strain selection associated with albinism, however, appears to have consistently impaired visual acuity. Therefore, a consideration of strain differences in visual function should accompany the selection of a rat model for behavioral tasks that involve vision, or when comparing visuo-behavioral measurements across rat strains.
机译:许多研究人员认为实验室老鼠的视力较差,因此,他们无需考虑由于劳累或经历而导致的老鼠视觉功能的差异。目前,尚不清楚大鼠驯化是否对实验室大鼠品系的视觉功能产生了负面影响,菌株白化病对大鼠视觉功能的影响,或实验室大鼠的视觉功能中是否存在与个体无关的菌株差异。色素沉着。为了解决这些问题,我们从心理上测量了实验大鼠的三种有色(Dark Agouti,Fisher -Norway,Long-Evans)和三种白化病(Fisher-344,Sprague-Dawley,Wistar)菌株的垂直光栅敏锐度,并进行了比较它们与野生大鼠的敏锐度。 Dark Agouti,Long-Evans和野生株的光栅阈值聚集在1.0个循环/度(c / d)附近,并且彼此之间没有显着差异。然而,Fisher-Norway大鼠的阈值明显更高,为1.5 c / d。 Fisher-344,Sprague-Dawley和Wistar菌株的光栅阈值聚类在0.5 c / d左右,显着低于有色菌株。这些数据表明实验室大鼠的视觉功能存在明显的应变变异性。 Long-Evans和Dark Agouti菌株的驯化似乎没有损害视敏度,但对于Fisher-Norway大鼠,选择性育种可能会增强它们的敏锐度。然而,与白化病相关的菌株选择似乎一直损害视敏度。因此,对于涉及视觉的行为任务,或在比较跨大鼠品系的视觉行为测量时,应考虑对视觉功能中的品系差异进行考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号