...
首页> 外文期刊>Aquaculture >Daytime summer access to pasture vs. free-stall barn in dairy cows with year-long outdoor experience: A case study
【24h】

Daytime summer access to pasture vs. free-stall barn in dairy cows with year-long outdoor experience: A case study

机译:白天夏季进入牧场的牧场与奶牛的自由摊位谷仓,户外经验长期户外经验:一个案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

With its documented health and behavioural benefits, one would expect dairy cows to have near unconditional preference for pasture. However, dairy cow preference is multifaceted with numerous factors contributing to the choices and or actions of the cow. Experience is one such factor that may play a role in the level of preference that a dairy cow displays for pasture. In the current case study, we investigated if cows, when given the choice, would go to and remain at pasture under Eastern Canadian summer climatic conditions. Two important components were introduced in the case study: the use of a herd with year-round experience with the outdoors and the provision of the same feed options (both fresh cut forage and haylage) inside and on pasture. In doing so, the effects of a novel, outdoor environment and feed preference could be mitigated. 32 organic Holstein cows (parity average +/- SD: 2.8 +/- 2.0) averaging 9211 kg/cow milk production were submitted to a 6-d test cycle comprised of three consecutively and randomly applied 2-d phases repeated 4x over the course of 8 weeks. During these phases, cows were restricted to a free-stall barn (forced-indoor), restricted to pasture (forced-outdoor), or provided the access to both options (free-choice) for a 7-h period. Live observations of activities (drinking, eating haylage, eating fresh forage, lying, and other) were conducted every 2 min by scan sampling during the forced-outdoor and choice phases. A group level analysis with a Friedman test followed by an Asymptotic General Independence test was used to analyze the difference in time spent performing each activity between weeks and hours when forced-outdoor. The number of cows on pasture during the free-choice phase was averaged by week and hour. A 2-sample t-test was also used to compare time doing activities inside (free-choice phase) to those outside (forced-outdoor phase). When given the option, as a group, cows went to and remained at pasture for a majority of the time, with the exception of week 3 where a reduction in the number of cows on pasture was observed (from >90 to 40%), possibly due to inclement weather. No difference in activities were reported between the indoor vs. pasture environments. Eating fresh forage more than haylage was observed in both the indoor and pasture environments. The case study suggests that cows with outdoor experience have a strong inclination towards the outdoors and to elements such as eating fresh forages that is normally associated with the natural behaviour of grazing, providing a baseline for future research on the importance of providing outdoor access to cows for more sustainable dairy systems. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:凭借其记录的健康和行为福利,人们希望奶牛靠近无条件的牧场偏好。然而,奶牛偏好是多方面,有许多因素有助于母牛的选择和或行动。经验是可能在奶牛展示牧场的偏好水平中发挥作用的一个这样的因素。在目前的案例研究中,我们调查了奶牛,当奶牛在选择时,将在加拿大夏季气候条件下留下并留在牧场。在案例研究中介绍了两个重要组成部分:使用群体随着全年的户外经验和在牧场内提供相同的饲料选择(新鲜切割牧草和草莓)。在这样做时,可以减轻新颖,室外环境和饲料偏好的影响。 32有机荷斯坦奶牛(平均平均+/- SD:2.8 +/- 2.0)平均9211千克/牛奶产量提交至连续三个组成的6-D试验周期,随机施加的2-D阶段在课程中重复4倍8周。在这些阶段,奶牛被限制在自由摊位(强制室内),限于牧场(强制室外),或者提供了7-H期间的选择(自由选择)。每2分钟通过扫描户外和选择阶段进行每2分钟进行每2分钟进行活动的实时观察(饮用,吃草,吃新鲜牧草,撒谎和其他)。使用弗里德曼测试的群体水平分析,然后用于渐近通用独立试验来分析在强制室外的数周和小时之间进行每次活动的时间差。自由选择阶段牧场上的奶牛的数量平均为每周和小时。 2样本T检验还用于将内部(自由选择阶段)的活动进行比较(强制 - 室外阶段)。当鉴于一个选项时,作为一个团体,奶牛在大多数时间留在牧场上,除了第3周外,观察到牧草的奶牛数量减少(从> 90%到40%),可能是由于恶劣的天气。在室内VS牧场环境之间没有出现任何差异。在室内和牧场环境中观察到吃新鲜的牧草比草坪。案例研究表明,带户外经验的奶牛对户外玩耍以及饮食新鲜饲料的元素具有强烈的倾向,这些元素通常与放牧的自然行为有关,为未来的对奶牛提供户外进入的重要性提供基准。更可持续的乳制品系统。 (c)2016年Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号