首页> 外文期刊>Applied thermal engineering: Design, processes, equipment, economics >A comprehensive comparison between substrate heating and light heating induced nanofluid droplet evaporations
【24h】

A comprehensive comparison between substrate heating and light heating induced nanofluid droplet evaporations

机译:底物加热与光加热诱导纳米流体液滴蒸发的全面比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A comprehensive comparison between substrate heating and light plasmonic heating induced nanofluid droplet evaporations is presented. The substrate temperature was kept as 36.5 degrees C for substrate heating, but a 1400 W/m(2) irradiation flux emitted by a xenon lamp was used for light heating. Both two heating modes yield constant contact diameter evaporation. Because light irradiation reorganizes nanoparticles to generate dynamically varied heat source in nanoscale due to the plasmonic effect, the two heating modes are found to display three differences. First, droplet surface temperature decreases monotonically from contact line to apex for substrate heating, but for light irradiation, droplet surface temperature displays nonmonotonic variation including a contact line region CLR and a bulk volume region BVR. Temperature gradient is significant in CLR but does not exist in BVR. Second, the substrate heating generates both radial flow and Marangoni flow in the whole droplet. Thus, coffee-ring and dispersed nanoparticles are observed on substrate. On the other hand, for light heating, the Marangoni flow is only confined in CLR due to the local temperature gradient there, creating most of nanoparticles deposition near the contact line. Third, because the droplet surface area decreases versus time, the evaporation rate reduces to behave the non-linear variation of droplet volume for substrate heating. The situation is changed for light heating induced droplet evaporation. The enhanced plasmonic heating in CLR due to nanoparticles deposition there offsets the effect of droplet surface area decreasing. Thus, light heating would give rise to the constant droplet evaporation rate, which is distinct to substrate heating. This work enhances the fundamental understanding of the droplet evaporation dynamics under the condition of light heating induced plasmonic heating effect.
机译:介绍了衬底加热和光等级加热诱导纳米流体液滴蒸发的全面比较。将衬底温度保持为36.5℃的底物加热,但是由氙灯发出的1400W / m(2)辐射通量用于光加热。两种加热模式都产生恒定的接触直径蒸发。由于光辐射重组纳米颗粒由于等级效应而在纳米级产生动态变化的热源,因此发现两种加热模式显示三种差异。首先,液滴表面温度从接触线向基板加热单调,但是对于光照射,液滴表面温度显示包括接触线区域CLR和散装体积区域BVR的非单调变化。 CLR中的温度梯度显着,但BVR中不存在。其次,基板加热在整个液滴中产生径向流动和Marangoni流动。因此,在基材上观察到咖啡环和分散的纳米颗粒。另一方面,对于光加热,由于局部温度梯度,Marangoni流量仅限于CLR,由于局部温度梯度,在接触线附近产生大部分纳米颗粒沉积。第三,因为液滴表面积与时间减小,所以蒸发速率降低以表现出基板加热的液滴体积的非线性变化。光线加热诱导液滴蒸发的情况发生了变化。由于纳米颗粒沉积,CLR中增强的等离子体加热有偏移液滴表面积减小的效果。因此,光加热会产生恒定的液滴蒸发速率,其与衬底加热不同。这项工作提高了光加热诱导等离子体加热效应的条件下对液滴蒸发动态的根本理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号