...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Water Management >Cost-effectiveness analysis of water-saving irrigation technologies based on climate change response: A case study of China
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness analysis of water-saving irrigation technologies based on climate change response: A case study of China

机译:基于气候变化响应的节水灌溉技术成本效益分析:以中国为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study provides a cost-effectiveness analysis of four water-saving irrigation techniques that are widely implemented in China to address the impacts of climate change: sprinkler irrigation, micro-irrigation, low-pressure pipe irrigation and channel lining. The aim is to thoroughly understand the economic feasibility of water-saving irrigation as an approach to coping with climate change. Based on the cost-effectiveness analysis, this study finds that water-saving irrigation is cost-effective in coping with climate change, and has benefits for climate change mitigation and adaptation, and for sustainable economic development. For the cost-effectiveness ratio of mitigation and adaptation, only that of channel lining is negative (for mitigation is -43.02 to -73.41 US$/t, for grain yield increase -34.35 to -20.13 US$/t, and for water saving -0.020 to -0.012 US$/m(3)). Sprinkler irrigation has the highest incremental cost for mitigation (476.03-691.64 US$/t), because when sprinkler irrigation is used, there may be additional energy needs to meet water pressure requirements, which may increase greenhouse gas emissions compared to traditional irrigation. For mitigation, in districts where the pumping head for pressure is lower than the critical energy saving head, sprinkler irrigation should be avoided. Micro-irrigation has the highest incremental cost for adaptation followed by sprinkler irrigation and low-pressure pipe irrigation, but when considering the revenues from improved adaptation, all of the measures assessed are economically feasible. The results suggest that for mitigation and adaptation objectives, micro-irrigation performs best. From an economic perspective, channel lining is recommended. Therefore, a balanced development of channel lining and micro-irrigation according to different geographical conditions is recommended. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究对在中国广泛采用的四种节水灌溉技术进行了成本效益分析,以应对气候变化的影响:喷灌,微灌,低压管道灌溉和河道衬砌。目的是彻底了解节水灌溉作为应对气候变化方法的经济可行性。基于成本效益分析,本研究发现节水灌溉在应对气候变化方面具有成本效益,并且对缓解和适应气候变化以及促进可持续经济发展具有益处。对于缓解和适应的成本效益比,仅渠道衬砌的成本效益比为负(缓解为-43.02至-73.41美元/吨,谷物单产增加-34.35至-20.13美元/吨,以及节水-0.020至-0.012美元/平方米(3))。喷灌的减缓增量成本最高(476.03-691.64美元/吨),因为使用喷灌时,可能需要更多的能源来满足水压的要求,与传统灌溉相比,这可能会增加温室气体的排放。为了减轻压力,在压力抽水头低于临界节能水头的地区,应避免洒水灌溉。微灌溉的适应增量成本最高,其次是喷灌和低压管道灌溉,但是当考虑到改善适应带来的收益时,所评估的所有措施在经济上都是可行的。结果表明,对于缓解和适应目标,微灌效果最好。从经济角度来看,建议使用渠道衬砌。因此,建议根据不同的地理条件均衡发展渠道衬砌和微灌。 (C)2013作者。由Elsevier B.V.发布。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号