首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology >Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carrier (HBOC) Development in Trauma: Previous Regulatory Challenges, Lessons Learned, and a Path Forward
【24h】

Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carrier (HBOC) Development in Trauma: Previous Regulatory Challenges, Lessons Learned, and a Path Forward

机译:基于血红蛋白的氧气载体(HBOC)在创伤中发育:以前的监管挑战,学习的经验教训以及前进的道路

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Historically, hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers (HBOCs) were being developed as "blood substitutes," despite their transient circulatory half-life (similar to 24 h) vs. transfused red blood cells (RBCs). More recently, HBOC commercial development focused on "oxygen therapeutic" indications to provide a temporary oxygenation bridge until medical or surgical interventions (including RBC transfusion, if required) can be initiated. This included the early trauma trials with HemAssist (R) (Baxter), Hemopure (R) (Biopure) and PolyHeme (R) (Northfield) for resuscitating hypotensive shock. These trials all failed due to safety concerns (e.g., cardiac events, mortality) and certain protocol design limitations. In 2008 the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) put all HBOC trials in the US on clinical hold due to the unfavorable benefit:risk profile demonstrated by various HBOCs in different clinical studies in a meta-analysis published by Natanson et al. (2008). During standard resuscitation in trauma, organ dysfunction and failure can occur due to ischemia in critical tissues, which can be detected by the degree of lactic acidosis. Sangart's Phase 2 trauma program with MP4OX therefore added lactate 5 mmol/L as an inclusion criterion to enroll patients who had lost sufficient blood to cause a tissue oxygen debt. This was key to the successful conduct of their Phase 2 program (ex-US, from 2009 to 2012) to evaluate MP4OX as an adjunct to standard fluid resuscitation and transfusion of RBCs. In 2013, Sangart shared their Phase 2b results with the FDA, and succeeded in getting the FDA to agree that a planned Phase 2c higher dose comparison study of MP4OX in trauma could include clinical sites in the US. Unfortunately, Sangart failed to secure new funding and was forced to terminate development and operations in Dec 2013, even though a regulatory path forward with FDA approval to proceed in trauma had been achieved.
机译:历史上,血红蛋白的氧载体(HBOC)正在被开发为“血液替代品”,尽管它们的瞬态循环半衰期(类似于24小时)与转染红细胞(RBC)。最近,HBOC商业开发的重点是“氧治疗”适应症,以提供临时氧合桥,直到医学或外科干预(包括RBC输血,如果需要)。这包括具有血管分子(r)(baxter),血液(r)(biopure)和多血液(Northfield)的早期创伤试验,用于复苏低血压。由于安全问题(例如,心脏事件,死亡率)和某些协议设计限制,这些试验均失败。 2008年,食品和药物管理局(FDA)将美国的所有HBOC试验置于临床持有的临床持有情况:在Natanson等人出版的Meta分析中,各种HBOC在不同临床研究中展示的风险状况。 (2008)。在创伤中的标准复苏期间,由于临时组织中的缺血,器官功能障碍和失败可能发生,这可以通过乳酸酸中毒程度来检测。 Sangart的第2期具有MP4ox的Trauma程序,因此添加了乳酸乳酸乳酸和 5 mmol / L作为纳入标准,以纳入失去足够血液以引起组织氧气债务的患者。这是他们第2阶段计划(前美国,2009年至2012年)成功进行的关键,以评估MP4Ox作为标准流体复苏和输血的辅助。 2013年,Sangart与FDA分享了他们的2B阶段结果,并成功地获得了FDA,同意创伤中MP4OX的计划2C更高剂量比较研究可能包括美国的临床部位。不幸的是,Sangart未能获得新的资金,并且被迫在2013年12月终止发展和运营,即使在达到创伤的FDA批准的监管道路上,也取得了促进的监管道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号