...
首页> 外文期刊>Current Science: A Fortnightly Journal of Research >Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for chlorophyll estimation based on high-resolution UAV imagery
【24h】

Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for chlorophyll estimation based on high-resolution UAV imagery

机译:基于高分辨率UAV图像的叶绿素估计的参数和非参数方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present study provides a systematic comparison of parametric and non-parametric retrieval methods using high-resolution data provided by the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). We used turmeric crop reflectance data to evaluate the vegetation index (VI)-based parametric methods and compared them with linear and nonlinear non-parametric methods to build a rigorous LCC estimation model. The study demonstrates that the best-performing VI was the normalized green red difference index (GNRDI), with R-2 = 0.68, RMSE = 0.13 and high processing speed of 0.08 s. With regard to non-parametric methods, almost all methods outperformed their parametric counterparts. Particularly, methods such as random forest (RF) and kernel ridge regression (KRR) showed the best performance characterized by R-2 > 0.72 and RMSE = 0.12 mg/g of fresh leaf weight. These non-parametric methods possessed the benefit of total spectral information utilization and enabled robust, non-linear relationship between the predictor and target variables, but computational complexity is a major drawback.
机译:本研究提供了使用由无人驾驶飞行器(UAV)提供的高分辨率数据的参数和非参数检索方法的系统比较。我们使用姜黄作物反射率数据来评估基于植被指数(VI)的参数化方法,并将其与线性和非线性非参数方法进行比较,以构建严格的LCC估计模型。该研究表明,最佳性能的VI是归一化的绿色红差分指数(GNRDI),R-2 = 0.68,RMSE = 0.13,加工速度为0.08秒。关于非参数方法,几乎​​所有方法都优于他们的参数对应物。特别地,例如随机森林(RF)和核脊回归(KRR)的方法显示了以R-2> 0.72和RmSE& = 0.12mg / g的新鲜叶重量的最佳性能。这些非参数方法具有总光谱信息利用的益处,并且在预测器和目标变量之间实现了鲁棒的鲁棒,非线性关系,但计算复杂性是一个主要缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号