首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >Methodologic Concerns Regarding a Study Concluding That Epidural Labor Analgesia Is Associated with a Decreased Risk of Postpartum Depression
【24h】

Methodologic Concerns Regarding a Study Concluding That Epidural Labor Analgesia Is Associated with a Decreased Risk of Postpartum Depression

机译:关于一项研究的方法论问题,该研究得出结论认为硬膜外分娩镇痛与降低产后抑郁风险相关

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To the Editor We advance the following concerns with the observational study of epidural analgesia and postpartum depression (PPD) by Ding et al.: Inadequately Addressed Bias1. Misclassification bias: Although defined as such, the study by Ding et al.1 does not meet the definition of a prospective cohort, because their sample was not depression-free at the time of exposure. The authors do not estimate the magnitude and direction of this misclassification bias on their findings. Given that the prevalence of depression is 20% among Chinese women, and that depressed women are less likely to advocate for pain control, the study results could be moderately biased toward a protective effect. 2. Selection bias: Obese subjects were excluded without clear justification. Obesity is not a contraindication for epidural analgesia and is actually associated with an increased incidence of epidural and a greater risk of PPD. The study reports a negative association between epidural analgesia and PPD. Given the proportion of obese women who were excluded (35% of the final sample size), there may be substantial bias in the direction of a significant protective association between epidural analgesia and PPD. Second, the authors present a greater loss to follow-up among the epidural group than the nonepidural group (24 vs 13). The reasons cited for this differential loss include known risk factors for PPD, namely, "too tired after delivery" and "bad mood because infant in the neonatal intensive care unit." Evidence shows that mothers of infants admitted to neonatal intensive care unit have greater-than-average rates of depression and anxiety. It is well established that patients with depression are more likely to be lost to follow-up. In Chinese society, the family makes medical decisions rather than the individual. Thus, the family's refusal to continue with the study could reflect their concern for the mother's mental health.
机译:致编辑我们通过Ding等人的硬膜外镇痛和产后抑郁症(PPD)的观察性研究,提出了以下问题:偏见不足1。错误分类的偏见:尽管如此定义,但丁等人的研究[1]不符合预期队列的定义,因为他们的样本在暴露时并非没有抑郁。作者并没有根据他们的发现估计这种错误分类偏倚的程度和方向。鉴于中国女性的抑郁症患病率为20%,并且抑郁症的女性不太可能主张控制疼痛,因此该研究结果可能会偏向于保护作用。 2.选择偏见:肥胖受试者没有明确的理由被排除在外。肥胖不是硬膜外镇痛的禁忌症,实际上与硬膜外发生率增加和PPD风险增加有关。该研究报告硬膜外镇痛与PPD之间存在负相关。考虑到被排除的肥胖女性比例(占最终样本量的35%),硬膜外镇痛和PPD之间显着保护性关联的方向可能存在重大偏差。其次,与非硬膜外组相比,硬膜外组的随访者损失更大(24 vs 13)。造成这种差异性损失的原因包括已知的PPD危险因素,即“分娩后太累”和“由于新生儿重症监护室的婴儿而情绪低落”。有证据表明,进入新生儿重症监护室的婴儿的母亲患抑郁症和焦虑症的比率高于平均水平。公认的是,抑郁症患者更容易失去随访。在中国社会,家庭做出医疗决定而不是个人做出决定。因此,家庭拒绝继续研究可能反映了他们对母亲的心理健康的关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号