...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >Comparison of glass slides and various digital-slide modalities for cytopathology screening and interpretation
【24h】

Comparison of glass slides and various digital-slide modalities for cytopathology screening and interpretation

机译:玻璃载玻片的比较和各种数码滑动模式对缩细胞病理学筛查和解释

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND Whole-slide imaging in cytology is limited when glass slides are digitized without z-stacks for focusing. Different vendors have started to provide z-stacking solutions to overcome this limitation. The Panoptiq imaging system allows users to create digital files combining low-magnification panoramic images with regions of interest (ROIs) that are imaged with high-magnification z-stacks. The aim of this study was to compare such panoramic images with conventional whole-slide images and glass slides for the tasks of screening and interpretation in cytopathology. METHODS Thirty glass slides, including 10 ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests and 20 nongynecologic cytology cases, were digitized with an Olympus BX45 integrated microscope with an attached Prosilica GT camera. ViewsIQ software was used for image acquisition and viewing. These glass slides were also scanned on an Aperio ScanScope XT at x40 (0.25m/pixel) with 1 z-plane and were viewed with ImageScope software. Digital and glass sides were screened and dotted/annotated by a cytotechnologist and were subsequently reviewed by 3 cytopathologists. For panoramic images, the cytotechnologist manually created digital maps and selected representative ROIs to generate z-stacks at a higher magnification. After 3-week washout periods, panoramic images were compared with Aperio digital slides and glass slides. RESULTSThe Panoptiq system permitted fine focusing of thick smears and cell clusters. In comparison with glass slides, the average screening times were 5.5 and 1.8 times longer with Panoptiq and Aperio images, respectively, but this improved with user experience. There was no statistical difference in diagnostic concordance between all 3 modalities. Users' diagnostic confidence was also similar for all modalities. CONCLUSIONS The Aperio whole-slide scanner with 1 z-plane scanning and the Panoptiq imaging system with z-stacking are both suitable for cytopathology screening and interpretation. However, ROI z-stacks do offer a superior mechanism for overcoming focusing problems commonly encountered with digital cytology slides. Unlike whole-slide imaging, the acquisition of representative z-stack images with the Panoptiq system requires a trained cytologist to create digital files. (C) 2017 American Cancer Society.
机译:背景技术当玻璃载玻片的数字化时,细胞学中的整体载玻片成像是有限的,而没有Z堆叠用于聚焦。不同的供应商已经开始提供Z堆叠解决方案来克服这种限制。 PanOptiq成像系统允许用户创建与使用高倍Z堆叠成像的感兴趣区域(ROI)组合数字文件。本研究的目的是将这种全景图像与传统的整个幻灯片和玻璃载玻片进行比较,用于缩放病理学中的筛选和解释任务。方法采用奥林巴斯BX45集成显微镜与附带的Prosicica GT相机用奥林巴斯BX45集成显微镜进行分三十个玻璃载玻片。 ViewsIQ软件用于图像采集和查看。还使用1 Z平面扫描这些玻璃载玻片,在X40(0.25米/像素)的Aperio Scanscope XT上扫描,并用AmpuerCope软件观察。用细胞技术学家筛选和点缀/点缀/点缀的数字和玻璃侧面,随后被3个细胞腔病变患者审查。对于全景图像,Cytotechnogist手动创建数字贴图并选择代表ROI,以在更高的放大率下生成Z堆叠。 3周洗涤期后,将全景图像与aperio数字载玻片和玻璃载玻片进行比较。结果是Panoptiq系统允许厚涂片和细胞簇的精细聚焦。与玻璃载玻片相比,PanOptiq和Aperio图像分别与Panoptiq和Aperio图像相比,平均筛选时间为5.5%,但随着用户体验,这种筛选时间越长。所有3个模式之间的诊断一致性没有统计差异。用户的诊断信心也类似于所有方式。结论具有1 Z平面扫描的APERIO全载扫描仪和具有Z堆叠的Panoptiq成像系统都适用于细胞病变筛查和解释。然而,ROI Z堆栈确实提供了一种越来越多的机制,用于克服具有数字细胞学幻灯片的常见问题。与全幻灯片成像不同,采集具有PanOptiq系统的代表性Z堆叠图像需要培养的细胞学家来创建数字文件。 (c)2017年美国癌症协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号