首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia: Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland >A randomised single blinded study of the administration of pre-warmed fluid vs active fluid warming on the incidence of peri-operative hypothermia in short surgical procedures
【24h】

A randomised single blinded study of the administration of pre-warmed fluid vs active fluid warming on the incidence of peri-operative hypothermia in short surgical procedures

机译:短期手术中预热液与主动液加温对围手术期低温发生率的随机单盲研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We compared the effect of delivering fluid warmed using two methods in 76 adult patients having short duration surgery. All patients received a litre of crystalloid delivered either at room temperature, warmed using an in-line wanning device or pre-warmed in a warming cabinet for at least 8 h. The tympanic temperature of those receiving fluid at room temperature was 0.4 H lower on arrival in recovery when compared with those receiving fluid from a warming cabinet (p = 0.008). Core temperature was below the hypothermic threshold of 36.0 H in seven (14%) patients receiving either type of warm fluid, compared to eight (32%) patients receiving fluid at room temperature (p = 0.03). The administration of 1 1 warmed fluid to patients having short duration general anaesthesia results in higher postoperative temperatures. Pre-warmed fluid, administered within 30 min of its removal from a warming cabinet, is as efficient at preventing peri-operative hypothermia as that delivered through an in-line warming system.
机译:我们比较了76例接受短期手术的成年患者使用两种方法加热液体的效果。所有患者均接受一升的晶体,该晶体在室温下递送,使用在线消光装置加热或在加热柜中预热至少8小时。与从保温柜中接收液体的人相比,在室温下接收液体的人的鼓膜温度在到达恢复状态时降低了0.4 H(p = 0.008)。七种(14%)接受任何一种温液的患者的核心温度低于36.0 H的低温阈值,而八种(32%)在室温下接受流体的患者的体温低于中心温度(p = 0.03)。对持续时间短的全身麻醉的患者施用1 1温暖的液体会导致更高的术后温度。从加热柜中取出后30分钟内进行预热的液体,与通过在线加热系统输送的液体一样,在预防围手术期体温过低方面同样有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号