首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics >Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to deciduous and permanent teeth.
【24h】

Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to deciduous and permanent teeth.

机译:比较正畸托槽与乳牙和恒牙的抗剪粘结强度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted (1) to compare the bond strengths of identical orthodontic brackets bonded to deciduous and permanent teeth with either of 2 primer/adhesive systems and (2) to evaluate the modes of bracket/adhesive failure. METHODS: Thirty-four permanent teeth and 34 deciduous teeth were collected. To these freshly extracted teeth, metal brackets were bonded with 2 primer/adhesive systems. These specimens were divided into 4 groups. In group I, consisting of 17 permanent teeth, the brackets were bonded with an acid-etching adhesive system; in group II, the self-etching adhesive system was used for bonding the brackets to 17 permanent teeth; in group III, consisting of 17 deciduous teeth, the acid-etching adhesive system was used; and in group IV, the self-etching adhesive system was used for bonding the brackets to 17 deciduous teeth. Shear bond strength was measured with a universal testing machine, and the mode of bracket/adhesive failure was determined according to the adhesive remnant index. RESULTS: The shear bond strengths of all 4 groups exceeded what is believed to be clinically sufficient strength of 6 to 8 MPa. Whether deciduous or permanent teeth, there were no significant differences in shear bond strength between the acid-etching and self-etching adhesive systems. The shear bond strengths of the brackets bonded to the deciduous teeth with either adhesive system were lower than those to the permanent teeth. Bond failure occurred at the enamel-adhesive interface more frequently in the self-etching adhesive system than in the acid-etching adhesive system. CONCLUSIONS: Bond strengths of brackets were lower with deciduous teeth but were high enough for clinical purposes.
机译:引言:进行了这项研究(1)比较使用两种底漆/粘合剂体系中的一种,将正畸托槽粘结到乳牙和恒牙的粘结强度;以及(2)评估托槽/粘结失败的方式。方法:收集34颗恒牙和34颗乳牙。在这些刚拔出的牙齿上,金属托槽用2个底漆/粘合剂系统粘结。这些标本分为4组。在由17个恒牙组成的I组中,托槽用酸蚀粘合剂系统粘合;在第二组中,使用自蚀刻粘合剂系统将托槽粘结到17个永久性牙齿上。在第三组中,由17个乳牙组成,使用了酸蚀粘合剂体系。在第IV组中,使用自蚀刻粘合剂系统将托槽粘合到17个乳齿上。用万能试验机测量剪切粘合强度,并根据粘合残余指数确定托槽/粘合破坏的方式。结果:所有4组的剪切粘结强度均超过了临床上认为足够的6至8 MPa的强度。不论是乳齿还是恒齿,酸蚀和自蚀粘合剂体系之间的剪切粘结强度均无显着差异。用两种胶粘剂体系粘结到乳齿上的托槽的抗剪粘结强度都比固定齿上的低。自酸蚀型胶粘剂系统比酸蚀型胶粘剂系统更容易在瓷釉-胶粘剂界面发生粘结破坏。结论:乳牙托槽的结合强度较低,但足以用于临床。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号