【24h】

E-rate: the agony and the ecstacy

机译:电子费率:痛苦与狂喜

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the filtering requirements added by the Children's Internet Protection Act, librarians who have previously filed for the e-rate should continue to do so (unless they're completely burned out on the bureaucratic burdens of the application process). As the FCC has been interpreting CIPA and the e-rate, even if you choose not to filter you can still get discounts on your data lines and your internal connections. And you should continue to file for discounts on your Internet connections--you can always refuse the money if CIPA is upheld in court. Bob Bocher's E-Rate FAQ at www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/dlcl/pld/cipafaq.html is the best resource on the topic (and my own PLA TechNote on filtering at www.pla.org/technotes/filtering.html is a nice companion). Alyce J. Bowers, director of Atlantic County (N.J.) Public Library, offered this important advice: "File separate applications for separate services. Do not combine your Internet with your telecommunications or POTS Plain Old Telephone Service , but do three or more separate applications." If something goes wrong, you only lose funding for that application, not all your services. Her library has received dollar 178,000 this year--a nice pile of dinero. Believe it or not, my best experience with the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division (which administers the e-rate program) was with an auditor (who shall remain nameless) who gently prodded me to go back and find phone bills that would ensure our application matched what we were claiming as our average telco expenses. You know who you are, you nice person! Others have commented on the help desk. John Richmond of Alpha Park Public Library District in Bartonville, Illinois, told me, "Despite the bureaucracy of it all, the real, live people I've spoken with at the help desk have been patient and kind." The application process is painful. Mary Satterwhite of Temple Terrace (Fla.
机译:尽管《儿童互联网保护法》增加了过滤要求,但以前已申请电子费率的图书馆员应继续这样做(除非他们完全被申请程序的官僚负担所累)。由于FCC一直在解释CIPA和电子费率,即使您选择不进行过滤,您仍然可以在数据线和内部连接上获得折扣。而且,您应该继续在Internet连接上申请折扣-如果CIPA在法庭上得到支持,您始终可以拒绝退款。 Bob Bocher的E-Rate常见问题解答,网址为www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/dlcl/pld/cipafaq.html,是该主题的最佳资源(以及我自己的关于过滤的PLA技术说明,网址为www.pla.org/technotes/ filter.html是一个不错的伴侣)。大西洋县(NJ)公共图书馆馆长Alyce J. Bowers提供了以下重要建议:“为单独的服务提交单独的应用程序。请勿将Internet与电信或POTS普通旧电话服务结合使用,而应进行三个或更多单独的应用程序。”如果出现问题,您只会为此应用程序损失资金,而不会损失所有服务。她的图书馆今年已收到17.8万美元,这笔钱简直是一笔钱。信不信由你,我在环球服务管理公司的学校和图书馆部门(负责管理e-rate计划)的最佳经历是与一名审计员(该人应保持匿名)一起,他温柔地劝我回去找电话费,确保我们的应用程序符合我们声称的平均电信费用。你知道你是谁,你这个好人!其他人在服务台上发表了评论。伊利诺伊州巴顿维尔的阿尔法公园公共图书馆区的约翰·里士满告诉我:“尽管官僚作风,但我在服务台与之交谈的真实,活泼的人一直很有耐心和友善。”申请过程很痛苦。圣殿露台(Fla。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号