...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of food technology >Comparison of Uncertainty Between Traditional and Alternative Methods for Food Microbiological Analysis
【24h】

Comparison of Uncertainty Between Traditional and Alternative Methods for Food Microbiological Analysis

机译:传统和替代食品微生物分析方法的不确定度比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objectives highlighted in the present study were to determine the estimates of measurement uncertainty associated with microbiological analysis in food samples performing a gage repeatability and reproducibility study on three different microbiological methods of analysis for the detection and quantification of total coliforms; Plate count method, 3M Petrifilm~(TM) count plates method and the MBS method. For all three methods the contribution the total gage R and R is less than 10%, demonstratingthe ability to accurately evaluate the concentration of total coliforms in food samples. However, the repeatability and reproducibility follows the tendency; Plate count method<3M Petrifilm~(TM) count plates method
机译:本研究强调的目标是确定食品样本中与微生物分析相关的测量不确定度的估计值,该样本对三种不同的微生物分析方法进行量具可重复性和再现性研究,以检测和定量总大肠菌群;板计数法,3M PetrifilmTM计数板法和MBS法。对于这三种方法,总量规R和R的贡献均小于10%,这表明能够准确评估食品样品中大肠菌群的浓度。但是,重复性和再现性遵循这种趋势。板计数法<3M Petrifilm〜TM计数板法<MBS法。该研究还强调指出,显着差异是由于操作员与分析样品之间的相互作用而导致的板数和3M Petrifilm〜(TM)计数板方法的差异,而对于MBS方法,则不会显着影响测量结果。可重复性和可重复性与更简单的分析程序有关,这表明不确定性肯定与手工工作量和结果的单独解释有关。结果证实,减少这些错误源对于减少人工,简化程序并提高自动化非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号