...
首页> 外文期刊>BioMed research international >Comparative Plasma Exposure and Lung Distribution of Two Human Use Commercial Azithromycin Formulations Assessed in Murine Model: A Preclinical Study
【24h】

Comparative Plasma Exposure and Lung Distribution of Two Human Use Commercial Azithromycin Formulations Assessed in Murine Model: A Preclinical Study

机译:在鼠模型中评估的两种人用商业阿奇霉素制剂的血浆暴露量和肺分布比较:临床前研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Azithromycin (AZM) therapeutic failure and relapses of patients treated with generic formulations have been observed in clinical practice. The main goal of this research was to compare in a preclinical study the serum exposure and lung tissue concentration of two commercial formulations AZM-based in murine model. The current study involved 264 healthy Balb-C. Mice were divided into two groups (n = 44): animals of Group A (reference formulation -R-) were orally treated with AZM suspension at 10 mg/kg of b.w. Experimental animals of Group B (generic formulation -G-) received identical treatment than Group A with a generic formulation AZM-based. The study was repeated twice as Phase II and III. Serum and lung tissue samples were taken 24 h post treatment. Validated microbiological assay was used to determine the serum pharmacokinetic and lung distribution of AZM. After the pharmacokinetic analysis was observed, a similar serum exposure for both formulations of AZM assayed. In contrast, statistical differences (P < 0.001) were obtained after comparing the concentrations of both formulations in lung tissue, being the values obtained for AUC and Cmax (AZM-R-) +1586 and 122%, respectively, than those obtained for AZM-G- in lung. These differences may indicate large differences on the distribution process of both formulations, which may explain the lack of efficacy/therapeutic failure observed on clinical practice.
机译:在临床实践中已观察到阿奇霉素(AZM)的治疗失败和使用通用制剂治疗的患者复发。这项研究的主要目的是在临床前研究中比较两种基于AZM的商业制剂在鼠模型中的血清暴露和肺组织浓度。目前的研究涉及264名健康的Balb-C。将小鼠分为两组(n = 44):用10mg / kg体重的AZM悬浮液口服处理A组的动物(参考制剂-R-)。 B组(通用制剂-G-)的实验动物与基于AZM的通用制剂的治疗组与A组相同。该研究在II期和III期进行了两次重复。治疗后24小时取血清和肺组织样品。经验证的微生物学测定用于确定AZM的血清药代动力学和肺部分布。观察药代动力学分析后,两种AZM制剂的血清暴露均相似。相反,在比较两种制剂在肺组织中的浓度后,获得了统计学差异(P <0.001),分别是AUC和Cmax(AZM-R-)+1586和122%的值,而不是AZM -G-在肺中。这些差异可能表明两种制剂的分配过程存在很大差异,这可能解释了在临床实践中缺乏疗效/治疗失败的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号