首页> 外文期刊>Allergy and asthma proceedings >Randomized double-blind comparison of cetirizine and fexofenadine after pollen challenge in the Environmental Exposure Unit: duration of effect in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
【24h】

Randomized double-blind comparison of cetirizine and fexofenadine after pollen challenge in the Environmental Exposure Unit: duration of effect in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

机译:环境暴露单位中花粉激发后西替利嗪和非索非那定的随机双盲比较:季节性变应性鼻炎患者的作用持续时间。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is published evidence that cetirizine has a longer duration of effect than fexofenadine. This study compared duration of effect and other measures of efficacy of cetirizine, 10 mg; fexofenadine, 180 mg; and placebo in allergic subjects exposed to pollen in the Environmental Exposure Unit. Eligible subjects (n = 575) were exposed to ragweed pollen (day 1, 7 hours; day 2, 5 hours) and randomized in double-blind fashion to once-daily cetirizine, 10 mg; fexofenadine, 180 mg; or placebo. The total symptom severity complex (TSSC) score, the primary efficacy variable, was based on four rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms rated at 20-minute intervals. Treatment evaluation was divided into three periods: period 1 TSSC, average of 15 scores obtained 0-5 hours after the first dose; period 2 TSSC, average of 9 scores obtained 21-24 hours after the first dose; and period 3 TSSC, average of 6 scores obtained 0-2 hours after the second dose. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline TSSC at period 2.Baseline TSSC was the final pretreatment score on day 1 and was 9.7 for cetirizine, 9.8 for fexofenadine, and 9.7 for placebo. For the primary efficacy end point, the reduction in baseline TSSC at period 2 was greater for cetirizine (-3.6) compared with fexofenadine (-2.7; p < 0.001) and placebo (-2.0; p < 0.001), representing a 33% greater reduction for cetirizine versus fexofenadine. Cetirizine continued to reduce TSSC more than fexofenadine (-5.2 versus -4.6; p = 0.017) and placebo (-3.9; p < 0.001) (period 3). Similar efficacy was observed in period 1 for both active treatments. Treatment-related adverse events were similar in all groups with an incidence of somnolence of 1.3% for both active medications. In conclusion, cetirizine produced a 33% greater reduction in SAR symptoms over the 21- to 24-hour interval after the first dose and for 40 minutes after the second dose, indicating a superior and longer duration of effect, which is relevant because both are once-daily medications. Onset of action was comparable and both treatments were safe and well tolerated.
机译:有公开的证据表明西替利嗪的作用持续时间比非索非那定更长。这项研究比较了西替利嗪10 mg的作用持续时间和其他疗效指标。非索非那定180毫克;在环境暴露单位中接触花粉的过敏性受试者使用安慰剂和安慰剂。符合条件的受试者(n = 575)暴露于豚草花粉(第1天,7小时;第2天,5小时),并以双盲方式随机分配至每天一次的西替利嗪10 mg;每天一次。非索非那定180毫克;或安慰剂。总症状严重程度综合评分(TSSC)评分是主要的疗效变量,是基于以20分钟为间隔进行评分的四种鼻结膜炎症状。治疗评估分为三个阶段:第1阶段TSSC,首次给药后0-5小时获得15项评分的平均值; TSSC 2期,第一次给药后21-24小时平均获得9分;在第三次TSSC期间,第二剂0-2小时后平均获得6分。主要疗效终点是第2阶段从基线TSSC的变化。基线TSSC是第1天的最终预处理得分,西替利嗪为9.7,非索非那定为9.8,安慰剂为9.7。对于主要疗效终点,西替利嗪(-3.6)在第2阶段的基线TSSC降低比非索非那定(-2.7; p <0.001)和安慰剂(-2.0; p <0.001)大,增加了33%西替利嗪与非索非那定相比减少。西替利嗪继续降低TSSC的幅度大于非索非那定(-5.2对-4.6; p = 0.017)和安慰剂(-3.9; p <0.001)(第3期)。在第1期中,两种活性治疗均观察到相似的疗效。所有组中与治疗相关的不良事件相似,两种有效药物的嗜睡发生率均为1.3%。总之,西替利嗪在第一次给药后的21至24小时内和第二次给药后的40分钟内,SAR症状的缓解率均提高了33%,这表明效果更好,持续时间更长,这很重要,因为两者每天一次的药物。作用的发作是可比较的,并且两种治疗都是安全的并且耐受性良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号