...
首页> 外文期刊>Biotechnology Law Report >Stem Cell Patents: Does T 0866/01 ('Euthanasia Compositions') of an Appeal Board of the EPO Provide the Answers for the Enlarged Board of Appeal Case G 2/06 ('Primate Embryonic Stem Cells')?
【24h】

Stem Cell Patents: Does T 0866/01 ('Euthanasia Compositions') of an Appeal Board of the EPO Provide the Answers for the Enlarged Board of Appeal Case G 2/06 ('Primate Embryonic Stem Cells')?

机译:干细胞专利:EPO上诉委员会的T 0866/01(“欧亚大陆组合物”)是否可为扩大的上诉案件G 2/06(“原始胚胎干细胞”)提供答案?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

THIS REPORT DEALS with decision T 1374/04 of a Technical Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO), which forwarded several questions concerning the patentability of claims directed to embryonic stem cells to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA). The case before the EBA is still pending as G2/06. Moral aspects of stem cell technology are the subject of great controversy among the European public. Whereas a detailed consideration of all moral aspects of stem cell technology may turn out to befairly complex, the EBA will have to make its decision solely on the basis of the EPC and the relevant articles and rules laid down therein, in particular, Article 53(a) EPC and Rule 23d(c) EPC. Here, I show how, within the legal framework of the EPC, the Technical Board in charge dealt with issues of morality in the recent Decision T 0866/01 ("Euthanasia compositions"). This case might provide some hints as to how the EBA might find a way to provide the answers in the case G 2/06 pending before it.
机译:该报告涉及欧洲专利局(EPO)上诉技术委员会的T 1374/04号决定,该决定将与针对胚胎干细胞的权利要求可专利性有关的几个问题转发给了扩大上诉委员会(EBA)。 EBA之前的案子仍待处理为G2 / 06。干细胞技术的道德方面是欧洲公众争论的主题。尽管对干细胞技术的所有道德方面的详细考虑可能会变得相当复杂,但EBA只能根据EPC及其中规定的相关条款和规则(尤其是第53条, a)EPC和规则23d(c)EPC。在这里,我展示了在EPC的法律框架内,负责技术的技术委员会如何处理最近的T 0866/01号决定(“大洋洲组成”)中的道德问题。这种情况可能会提示EBA如何在G 2/06待决的情况下找到提供答案的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号