...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Preventive Medicine >Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the Guide to Community Preventive Services. Task Force on Community Preventive Services.
【24h】

Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the Guide to Community Preventive Services. Task Force on Community Preventive Services.

机译:《社区预防服务指南》中用于系统审核的数据收集工具和程序。社区预防服务工作队。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: A standardized abstraction form and procedure was developed to provide consistency, reduce bias, and improve validity and reliability in the Guide to Community Preventive Services: Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Recommendations (the Guide). DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENT: The content of the abstraction form was based on methodologies used in other systematic reviews; reporting standards established by major health and social science journals; the evaluation, statistical and meta-analytic literature; expert opinion and review; and pilot-testing. The form is used to classify and describe key characteristics of the intervention and evaluation (26 questions) and assess the quality of the study's execution (23 questions). Study procedures and results are collected and specific threats to the validity of the study are assessed across six categories (intervention and study descriptions, sampling, measurement, analysis, interpretation of results and other execution issues). DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES: Each study is abstracted by two independent reviewers and reconciled by the chapter development team. Reviewers are trained and provided with feedback. DISCUSSION: What to abstract and how to summarize the data are discretionary choices that influence conclusions drawn on the quality of execution of the study and its effectiveness. The form balances flexibility for the evaluation of papers with different study designs and intervention types with the need to ask specific questions to maximize validity and reliability. It provides a structured format that researchers and others can use to review the content and quality of papers, conduct systematic reviews, or develop manuscripts. A systematic approach to developing and evaluating manuscripts will help to promote overall improvement of the scientific literature.
机译:简介:开发了标准化的抽象形式和程序,以提供一致性,减少偏差并提高《社区预防服务指南:系统评价和循证建议》(该指南)的可靠性。数据收集工具:摘要表的内容基于其他系统评价中使用的方法。报告主要卫生和社会科学期刊制定的标准;评价,统计和荟萃分析文献;专家意见和审查;和中试测试。该表格用于分类和描述干预和评估的关键特征(26个问题),并评估研究执行的质量(23个问题)。收集研究程序和结果,并在六个类别(干预和研究说明,抽样,测量,分析,结果解释和其他执行问题)中评估对研究有效性的特定威胁。数据收集程序:每项研究均由两名独立的审阅者进行摘要,并由章节开发团队进行协调。对审阅者进行培训并提供反馈。讨论:摘要和如何汇总数据是可自由选择的选择,这些选择会影响对研究执行质量及其有效性得出的结论。该表格在评估具有不同研究设计和干预类型的论文的灵活性与要求提出特定问题以最大化有效性和可靠性的需求之间取得了平衡。它提供了一种结构化的格式,研究人员和其他人员可以用来审阅论文的内容和质量,进行系统的审阅或编写稿件。开发和评估手稿的系统方法将有助于促进科学文献的全面改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号