首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Veterinary Behavior: clinical applications and research >Reliability of a descriptive reference ethogram for equitation science
【24h】

Reliability of a descriptive reference ethogram for equitation science

机译:官方科学描述性参考条例的可靠性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An ethogram and its components, correctly defined behavior units, are the fundamental measuring tools for (applied) ethology and, therefore, also for equitation science, the nascent discipline that gathers evidence based on horse training, handling, and riding. However, there is currently no consensus on names and definitions of equine behaviors, and no purely descriptive ethogram for horses is available. As structural descriptions of behavioral units are a starting point for experimental enquiries into their function, cause, or ontogeny, this project sets out to draft and test the reliability of a descriptive reference ethogram for domestic horses (Equus caballus). Classification, names, and definitions of behaviors were descriptive and assigned to categories according to structural similarities. An international panel of participants (n = 23) was established to represent both researchers in equitation science and practitioners, including trainers, riders, coaches, and veterinarians. A part of the ethogram was tested by asking the panel to score 30 short video clips for 20 different behaviors and requesting feedback on the ethogram. Statistical analyses with logistic mixed models showed that variability between observers (&0.0001) was considerably lower than between video clips (0.15), indicating a high reliability of behavioral scoring. This reliability remained even when only considering the three most commented on behaviors (turn, jump, and buck) (clip 2.72, panelist 0.01). There was no significant difference between researchers and practitioners, but the variability of scores for simple video clips (one or two behaviors) differed significantly from more complex ones (P & 0.0001). This preliminary descriptive ethogram for horses in domestic contexts merits further development and will require the addition of more behaviors and therefore more fine-tuned definitions. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:赛道格及其组件,正确定义的行为单位是(应用)道德的基本测量工具,因此,也是为了良好的习俗科学,即加入基于马训练,处理和骑行的证据的新纪律。但是,目前没有关于马行为的名称和定义的共识,并且可以使用马匹的纯粹描述性规格。由于行为单位的结构描述是实验查询的起点,即其功能,原因或组来,该项目列出了草案,并测试了家庭马(Equus Caballus)的描述性参考赛道格法的可靠性。行为的分类,姓名和定义是描述性的,并根据结构性相似分配给类别。建立了一个国际参与者(n = 23),以代表官方科学和从业者的研究人员,包括培训师,骑手,教练和兽医。通过询问小组获得30个短视频剪辑进行20个不同行为并要求对符号格法进行反馈来测试该条例的一部分。具有逻辑混合模型的统计分析表明,观察者(& LT; 0.0001)之间的可变性显着低于视频夹(0.15)之间的可变性,表明行为评分的高可靠性。即使只考虑三项对行为(转弯,跳跃和降压)(剪辑2.72,小组成员0.01)时,这种可靠性也仍然存在。研究人员和从业者之间没有显着差异,但简单的视频剪辑(一个或两个行为)的分数的变化显着不同于更复杂的夹子(P& LT; 0.0001)。在国内背景下的马匹的这种初步描述性规格值得进一步发展,并将增加更多行为和更精细的定义。 (c)2018年Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号