首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science >Effect of Puddling and Direct Sowing of Rice on Soil Physical Health and Water Productivity of Rice-Wheat Cropping System under Different Irrigation Regimes
【24h】

Effect of Puddling and Direct Sowing of Rice on Soil Physical Health and Water Productivity of Rice-Wheat Cropping System under Different Irrigation Regimes

机译:不同灌溉制度下水稻水稻土壤体育健康和水生产率水稻的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A field experiment was conducted during 2012-13 to 2013-14 at the research farm of ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi to study the effect of three rice cultivation methods, viz., direct seeded rice (DSR), system of rice intensification (SRI) and conventional puddled transplanted rice (PTR) under adequate and deficit irrigation on soil structure and the water productivity of rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS). Results showed that mean weight diameter and percentage of macro-aggregate stability decreased under PTR (0.86 mm and 71.8%) and SRI (0.85 mm and 74.2%) compared with DSR (1.00 mm and 79.5%) method. The SRI method resulted in significantly higher yield of rice than PTR and DSR by 15.9 and 42.6 per cent, respectively. Water productivity of rice under SRI and DSR was significantly higher than PTR by 41.1 and 34.1 per cent, respectively. The grain yield and water productivity of wheat following DSR were significantly higher than those following PTR by 23.7 and 11.8 per cent, respectively. Moreover, considering RWCS as a whole, DSR resulted in significantly higher system water productivity (7.01 kg ha-mnr1) and significantly lower water use (1390 mm) compared with PTR and SRI methods.
机译:新德里炼金 - 印度农业研究所的研究区2012-13至2013-14期间进行了田间实验,研究了三种水稻栽培方法,枸杞子,稻米直播水稻(DSR)的影响在土壤结构充足和缺陷灌溉中的增强(SRI)和常规泥浆移植稻米(PTR)及水稻 - 小麦种植系统(RWCS)的水生产率。结果表明,与DSR(1.00mm和79.5%)的方法相比,Ptr(0.86mm和71.8%)和SRI(0.85mm和74.2%)下降的平均重量直径和宏观聚集稳定性的百分比。 SRI方法分别比PTR和DSR显着提高了米的产量,分别为15.9%和42.6%。 SRI和DSR下水稻的水生产率分别明显高于PTR 41.1和34.1%。 DSR之后小麦的籽粒产量和水生产率分别比彼得的显着高出23.7%和11.8%。此外,考虑到整体RWC,DSR导致系统水生产率显着提高(7.01千克HA-MNR1),与PTR和SRI方法相比,水使用量显着降低(1390 mm)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号