...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS >Discrepancy-Based Evidence for Loss of Thinking Abilities (DELTA): Development and Validation of a Novel Approach to Identifying Cognitive Changes
【24h】

Discrepancy-Based Evidence for Loss of Thinking Abilities (DELTA): Development and Validation of a Novel Approach to Identifying Cognitive Changes

机译:基于思维能力丧失的差异证据(Delta):开发和验证一种识别认知变化的新方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To develop and validate the Discrepancy-based Evidence for Loss of Thinking Abilities (DELTA) score. The DELTA score characterizes the strength of evidence for cognitive decline on a continuous spectrum using well-established psychometric principles for improving detection of cognitive changes. Methods: DELTA score development used neuropsychological test scores from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort (two tests each from Memory, Executive Function, and Language domains). We derived regression-based normative reference scores using age, gender, years of education, and word-reading ability from robust cognitively normal ADNI participants. Discrepancies between predicted and observed scores were used for calculating the DELTA score (range 0-15). We validated DELTA scores primarily against longitudinal Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) and Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) scores (baseline assessment through Year 3) using linear mixed models and secondarily against cross-sectional Alzheimer's biomarkers. Results: There were 1359 ADNI participants with calculable baseline DELTA scores (age 73.7 +/- 7.1 years, 55.4% female, 100% white/Caucasian). Higher baseline DELTA scores (stronger evidence of cognitive decline) predicted higher baseline CDR-SOB (Delta R-2 = .318) and faster rates of CDR-SOB increase over time (Delta R-2 = .209). Longitudinal changes in DELTA scores tracked closely and in the same direction as CDR-SOB scores (fixed and random effects of mean + mean-centered DELTA, Delta R-2 > .7). Results were similar for FAQ scores. High DELTA scores predicted higher PET-A beta SUVr (rho = 324), higher CSF-pTau/CSF-A beta ratio (rho = .460), and demonstrated PPV > .9 for positive Alzheimer's disease biomarker classification. Conclusions: Data support initial development and validation of the DELTA score through its associations with longitudinal functional changes and Alzheimer's biomarkers. We provide several considerations for future research and include an automated scoring program for clinical use.
机译:目的:开发和验证基于差异的差异证据,以丧失思维能力(Delta)得分。 Delta得分特征是使用良好建立的心动测量原理来改善认知变化的持续频谱对认知性能下降的证据的强度。方法:Delta得分开发使用来自阿尔茨海默病神经影像倡议(ADNI)群体的神经心理学检测分数(来自内存,执行功能和语言域的两次测试)。我们使用年龄,性别,年龄的教育和来自强大的认知正常的Adni参与者的级别的基于年龄,性别,教育和阅读能力来源的基于回归的规范参考分数。预测和观察到的分数之间的差异用于计算Delta评分(范围0-15)。我们经过验证的三角洲分数,主要针对纵向临床痴呆症等级 - 盒子(CDR-SOB)和功能活动问卷(常见问题解答)(基准评估)使用线性混合模型和二次反对横截面阿尔茨海默氏症的生物标志物(常见问题评估)。结果:有1359名ADNI参与者可计算的基线三角洲分数(73.7岁+/- 7.1岁,55.4%的女性,100%白色/白种人)。更高的基线三角洲评分(更强的认知拒绝证据)预测了更高的基线CDR-SOB(Delta R-2 = .318),随着时间的推移增加了CDR-Sob的更快速率(Delta R-2 = .209)。 Delta分数的纵向变化紧密地跟踪,与CDR-SOB分数相同(平均+平均达到的平均+平均Δ,ΔR-2> .7)。结果与常见问题分数相似。高δ分数预测较高的PET-AβSUVR(RHO = 324),更高的CSF-PTAU / CSF-Aβ比(RHO = .460),并证明了PPV> .9,用于阳性阿尔茨海默病生物标志物分类。结论:数据支持通过其关联与纵向功能变化和Alzheimer的生物标志物的关联初步开发和验证。我们为未来的研究提供了几种考虑因素,并包括一个用于临床使用的自动评分计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号