首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Oriental Society >Justifying Gender Inequality in the Shafii Law School:Two Case Studies of Muslim Legal Reasoning
【24h】

Justifying Gender Inequality in the Shafii Law School:Two Case Studies of Muslim Legal Reasoning

机译:证明了Shafii法学院的性别不平等:穆斯林法律推理的两种案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The topic of "women and Islam" is highly contentious in both popular and academic literature. While this broad topic often addresses the status of Muslim women in their diverse cultures, the focal points of investigation frequently tend to be of a legal nature, such as dress code, marriage and divorce rights, or women leading mixed congregations in communal prayer. Yet even when the sphere of inquiry is limited to specific topics of Islamic law, scholars must engage an immense library that can be bifurcated into normative and effectual texts. The former category comprises textbooks and their commentaries (fiqh books proper), books on legal theory (usul al-fiqh), and collections of fatwas (responsa); the latter one consists of court registers (sijillat) and state-promulgated laws (qanun).~2
机译:“妇女和伊斯兰教”的主题在流行和学术文献中都是高度争议的。 虽然这一广泛的主题往往解决了穆斯林妇女在各种文化中的地位,但常规调查的焦点往往具有法律性质,如礼服代码,婚姻和离婚权,或在公共祷告中领先的混合会众。 然而,即使询问领域仅限于伊斯兰法律的特定主题,学者必须参与巨大的图书馆,该图书馆可以分叉为规范和有效的文本。 前类别包括教科书及其评论(Fiqh书籍适当),法律理论书籍(USUL al-Fiqh)和Fatwas(Replatea)的集合; 后者的人由法院登记(Sijillat)和国家颁布的法律(Qanun)组成。〜2

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号