首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Inclusion of Highest Glasgow Coma Scale Motor Component Score in Mortality Risk Adjustment for Benchmarking of Trauma Center Performance
【24h】

Inclusion of Highest Glasgow Coma Scale Motor Component Score in Mortality Risk Adjustment for Benchmarking of Trauma Center Performance

机译:将Glasgow Coma Scale Motor分量分数列入死亡风险调整,以进行创伤中心性能的基准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is the most widely used measure of traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity. Currently, the arrival GCS motor component (mGCS) score is used in risk-adjustment models for external benchmarking of mortality. However, there is evidence that the highest mGCS score in the first 24 hours after injury might be a better predictor of death. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of including the highest mGCS score on the performance of risk-adjustment models and subsequent external benchmarking results. Study Design Data were derived from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program analytic dataset (January 2014 through March 2015) and were limited to the severe TBI cohort (16 years or older, isolated head injury, GCS ≤8). Risk-adjustment models were created that varied in the mGCS covariates only (initial score, highest score, or both initial and highest mGCS scores). Model performance and fit, as well as external benchmarking results, were compared. Results There were 6,553 patients with severe TBI across 231 trauma centers included. Initial and highest mGCS scores were different in 47% of patients (n?= 3,097). Model performance and fit improved when both initial and highest mGCS scores were included, as evidenced by improved C-statistic, Akaike Information Criterion, and adjusted R-squared values. Three-quarters of centers changed their adjusted odds ratio decile, 2.6% of centers changed outlier status, and 45% of centers exhibited a ≥0.5-SD change in the odds ratio of death after including highest mGCS score in the model. Conclusions This study supports the concept that additional clinical information has the potential to not only improve the performance of current risk-adjustment models, but can also have a meaningful impact on external benchmarking strategies. Highest mGCS score is a good potential candidate for inclusion in additional models.
机译:背景技术Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS)是最广泛使用的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)严重程度。目前,到达GCS电机组件(MGCS)得分用于风险调整模型,用于死亡率的外部基准。然而,有证据表明,受伤后的前24小时的最高MGCS分数可能是一种更好的死亡预测因素。我们的目标是评估包括最高MGCS评分对风险调整模型的表现和随后的外部基准结果的影响。研究设计数据来自Trauma质量改进计划分析数据集(2015年1月至2015年3月),仅限于严重的TBI队列(16岁或以上,孤立的头部损伤,GCS≤8)。创建风险调整模型仅在MGCS协变量中变化(初始得分,最高分,或初始和最高MGCS分数)。比较模型性能和适合,以及外部基准结果。结果包括6,553名患有231个创伤中心的严重TBI患者。初始和最高的MGCS分数在47%的患者中有所不同(N?= 3,097)。当包括初始和最高的MGCS分数时,模型性能和适应性改进,通过改进的C统计,Akaike信息标准和调整后的R平方值证明。四分之三的中心改变了调整后的赔率比例,4.6%的中心改变了异常的状态,45%的中心在模型中包括最高的MGCS得分之后,45%的中心发生了≥0.5-SD的变化。结论本研究支持其他临床信息的概念,不仅可以提高当前风险调整模型的性能,还可以对外部基准策略产生有意义的影响。最高的MGCS分数是含有额外模型的良好潜在候选者。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Department of Surgery Division of General Surgery University of Toronto;

    Department of Surgery Division of General Surgery University of Toronto;

    Sunnybrook Research Institute Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre;

    Sunnybrook Research Institute Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre;

    Trauma Quality Improvement Program American College of Surgeons;

    Trauma Quality Improvement Program American College of Surgeons;

    Trauma Quality Improvement Program American College of Surgeons;

    Department of Surgery Division of General Surgery University of Toronto;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 外科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号