首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Effect of Surgeon and Hospital Volume on Emergency General Surgery Outcomes
【24h】

Effect of Surgeon and Hospital Volume on Emergency General Surgery Outcomes

机译:外科医生与医院数量对应急普通手术结果的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Emergency general surgery (EGS) contributes to half of all surgical mortality nationwide, is associated with a 50% complication rate, and has a 15% readmission rate within 30 days. We assessed associations between surgeon and hospital EGS volume with these outcomes. Study Design Using Maryland's Health Services Cost Review Commission database, we identified nontrauma EGS procedures performed by general surgeons among patients 20 years or older, who were admitted urgently or emergently, from July 2012 to September 2014. We created surgeon and hospital volume categories, stratified EGS procedures into simple (mortality ≤ 0.5%) and complex (>0.5%) procedures, and assessed postoperative mortality, complications, and 30-day readmissions. Multivariable logistic regressions both adjusted for clinical factors and accounted for clustering by individual surgeons. Results We identified 14,753 procedures (61.5% simple EGS, 38.5% complex EGS) by 252 (73.3%) low-volume surgeons (≤25 total EGS procedures/year), 63 (18.3%) medium-volume surgeons (26 to 50/year), and 29 (8.4%) high-volume surgeons (>50/year). Low-volume surgeons operated on one-third (33.1%) of all patients. For simple procedures, the very low rate of death (0.2%) prevented a meaningful regression with mortality; however, there were no associations between low-volume surgeons and complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.07; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.41) or 30-day readmissions (aOR 0.80; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.01) relative to high-volume surgeons. Among complex procedures, low-volume surgeons were associated with greater mortality (aOR 1.64; 95% CI 1.12 to 2.41) relative to high-volume surgeons, but not complications (aOR 1.06; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.32) or 30-day readmission (aOR 0.99; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.22). Low-volume hospitals (≤125 total EGS procedures/year) relative to high-volume hospitals (>250/year) were not associated with mortality, complications, or 30-day readmissions for simple or complex procedures. Conclusions We found evidence that surgeon EGS volume was associated with outcomes. Developing EGS-specific services, mentorship opportunities, and clinical pathways for less-experienced surgeons may improve outcomes.
机译:背景技术应急普通手术(EGS)有助于全国各种外科死亡率的一半,与50%的并发症率相关,并在30天内具有15%的阅约率。我们评估了外科医生和医院的协会,例如这些结果。使用马里兰州的健康服务成本审查委员会数据库的研究设计,我们确定了20岁或以上的患者中的一般外科医生在2012年7月到2014年7月入院的夜间外科医生进行的非法外科医生。我们创建了外科医生和医院的大纲,分层EGS程序进入简单(死亡率≤0.5%)和复合物(> 0.5%)程序,并评估术后死亡率,并发症和30天的阅览。多变量逻辑回归调整临床因素,并占各个外科医生的聚类。结果我们鉴定了14,753个程序(61.5%简单的EGS,38.5%的复合物EGS),达252(73.3%)低容量外科医生(≤25总,EGS程序/年),63(18.3%)中体积外科医生(26至50 /年份)和29名(8.4%)大容量外科医生(> 50 /年)。低批量外科医生在所有患者的三分之一(33.1%)运行。为了简单的程序,死亡率的低率(0.2%)阻止了死亡率有意义的回归;但是,低体积外科医生和并发症之间没有关联(调整的赔率比[AOR] 1.07; 95%CI 0.81至1.41)或30天的阅览(AOR 0.80; 95%CI 0.64至1.01)相对于大容量外科医生。在复杂的程序中,低容量外科医生相对于大容量外科医生(AOR 1.64; 95%CI 1.12至2.41)相关,但没有并发症(AOR 1.06; 95%CI 0.85至1.32)或30天的入院(AOR 0.99; 95%CI 0.80至1.22)。相对于大容量医院(> 250 /年)的低储蓄医院(≤125个总程序/年)与大量或复杂的程序的死亡率,并发症或30天的阅览无关。结论我们发现证据表明外科医生egs体积与结果相关。制定特定于特定的服务,助理机会和临床途径,可为较少经验丰富的外科医生提高结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号