首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health policy >Tobacco papers and tobacco industry ties in regulatory toxicology and pharmacology
【24h】

Tobacco papers and tobacco industry ties in regulatory toxicology and pharmacology

机译:烟草论文和烟草行业在监管毒理学和药理学方面联系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We examined the relationship between the tobacco industry and the journal Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (RTP) using the Truth Tobacco Industry Documents Library and internet sources. We determined the funding relationships, and categorised the conclusions of all 52 RTP papers on tobacco or nicotine between January 2013 and June 2015, as "positive'', "negative'' or "neutral'' for the tobacco industry. RTP's editor, 57% (4/7) of associate editors and 37% (14/38) of editorial board members had worked or consulted for tobacco companies. Almost all (96%, 50/52) of the papers had authors with tobacco industry ties. Seventy-six percent (38/50) of these papers drew conclusions positive for industry; none drew negative conclusions. The two papers by authors not related to the tobacco industry reached conclusions negative to the industry (p .001). These results call into question the confidence that members of the scientific community and tobacco product regulators worldwide can have in the conclusions of papers published in RTP.
机译:我们研究了烟草业与杂志毒理学和药理学(RTP)之间的关系,使用真相烟草行业文件图书馆和互联网来源。我们确定了资金关系,并将所有52篇RTP论文的结论分类为2013年1月至2015年6月至2015年6月至2015年6月,为烟草业的“负”,“负面”或“中立”。RTP的编辑,57助理编辑的%(4/7)和37%(14/38)编辑委员会成员曾为烟草公司进行过工作或咨询。几乎所有(96%,50/52)的论文都有烟草行业的作者。七十-SIX百分比(38/50)这些论文提出了阳性的行业;没有人提出了负面的结论。作者与烟草行业无关的两篇论文达到了行业的结论(P& .001)。这些结果呼叫质疑科学界和烟草产品监管机构全球的信心可以在RTP发表的论文的结论中获得。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号