...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of bioethics >Would we rather lose our life than lose our self? Lessons from the Dutch debate on euthanasia for patients with dementia
【24h】

Would we rather lose our life than lose our self? Lessons from the Dutch debate on euthanasia for patients with dementia

机译:我们宁愿失去生命,也不愿失去自我?荷兰对痴呆症患者的安乐死辩论的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article reviews the Dutch societal debate on euthanasia/assisted suicide in dementia cases, specifically Alzheimer's disease. It discusses the ethical and practical dilemmas created by euthanasia requests in advance directives and the related inconsistencies in the Dutch legal regulations regarding euthanasia/assisted suicide. After A an initial focus on euthanasia in advanced dementia, the actual debate concentrates on making euthanasia/assisted suicide possible in the very early stages of dementia. A review of the few known cases of assisted suicide of people with so-called early dementia raises the question why requests for euthanasia/assisted suicide from patients in the early stage of (late onset) Alzheimer's disease are virtually non-existent. In response to this question two explanations are offered. It is concluded that, in addition to a moral discussion on the limits of anticipatory choices, there is an urgent need to develop research into the patient's perspective with regard to medical treatment and care-giving in dementia, including end-of-lifecare.
机译:本文回顾了荷兰社会关于痴呆症患者,特别是阿尔茨海默氏病中的安乐死/辅助自杀的争论。它讨论了安乐死的事先指令所造成的道德和实际困境,以及有关安乐死/辅助自杀的荷兰法律法规中的相关矛盾之处。在最初关注晚期痴呆中的安乐死之后,实际的争论集中在使痴呆的早期阶段就可以实施安乐死/辅助自杀。对少数已知的所谓的早期痴呆症患者的辅助自杀案例的评论提出了一个问题,即为什么实际上(不晚于)阿尔茨海默氏病患者对安乐死/辅助自杀的要求几乎不存在。针对此问题,提供了两种解释。结论是,除了就预期选择的局限性进行道德讨论外,迫切需要对患者在痴呆症的医疗和护理(包括临终护理)方面的观点进行研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号