...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurointerventional surgery >Effect of balloon guide catheter on clinical outcomes and reperfusion in Trevo thrombectomy
【24h】

Effect of balloon guide catheter on clinical outcomes and reperfusion in Trevo thrombectomy

机译:气球导管对特雷沃血栓形成术临床结果再灌注的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Solitaire stent retriever registry showed improved reperfusion, faster procedure times, and better outcome in acute stroke patients with large vessel occlusion treated with a balloon guide catheter (BGC) and Solitaire stent retriever compared with a conventional guide catheter. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether use of a BGC with the Trevo stent retriever improves outcomes compared with a conventional guide catheter.The TRACK registry recruited 23 sites to submit demographic, clinical, and site adjudicated angiographic and outcome data on consecutive patients treated with the Trevo stent retriever. BGC use was at the discretion of the physician.536 anterior circulation patients (of whom 279 (52.1%) had BGC placement) were included in this analysis. Baseline characteristics were notable for younger patients in the BGC group (65.4±15.3 vs 68.1±13.6, P=0.03) and lower rate of hypertension (72% vs 79%, P=0.06). Mean time from symptom onset to groin puncture was longer in the BGC group (357 vs 319?min, P=0.06).Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/3 scores were higher in the BGC cohort (84% vs 75.5%, P=0.01). There was no difference in reperfusion time, first pass effect, number of passes, or rescue therapy. Good clinical outcome at 3 months was superior in patients with BGC (57% vs 40%; P=0.0004) with a lower mortality rate (13% vs 23%, P=0.008). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that BGC use was an independent predictor of good clinical outcome (OR 2; 95%?CI 1.3 to 3.1, P=0.001).In acute stroke patients presenting with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion, use of a BGC with the Trevo stent retriever resulted in improved reperfusion, improved clinical outcome, and lower mortality.
机译:Solitaire支架猎犬登记处显示出改善的再灌注,更快的过程时间和急性中风患者的急性中风患者的更好的结果,与常规导管相比,用气囊引导导管(BGC)和Solitaire支架检索器进行了大容器闭塞。本研究的目标是评估与特雷沃支架猎犬的BGC是否使用与传统导管相比改善了结果。赛道登记处招募了23个地点,以提交细连续患者治疗的连续患者的人口统计,临床和现场判决数据与特雷沃支架猎犬。 BGC使用是由医生的酌情酌情决定(其中279(52.1%)的前循环患者被列入此分析中。 BGC组的较年轻患者(65.4±15.3 Vs 68.1±13.6,P = 0.03)和高血压率较低(72%vs 79%,P = 0.06)。来自症状发作到腹股沟刺穿的平均时间在BGC组中更长(357 Vs 319?min,P = 0.06)。BGC队列中的脑梗死2b / 3分数较高(84%vs 75.5%,p = 0.01 )。再灌注时间没有差异,首次通过效果,通行证数量或救援治疗。 3个月的良好临床结果是BGC患者的优越性(57%vs 40%; p = 0.0004),死亡率下降(13%vs 23%,p = 0.008)。多变量分析表明,BGC使用是良好的临床结果(或2; 95%?CI 1.3至3.1,P = 0.001)的独立预测因子。急性中风患者用前循环大容器闭塞,使用BGC与特雷沃的使用BGC支架猎犬导致再灌注改善,改善临床结果,降低死亡率。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Department of Neurology Boston University School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA;

    Neurology University of Toledo Toledo OH US;

    Department of Neurology Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia USA;

    Department of Neurology Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia USA;

    California Pacific Medical Center San Francisco California USA;

    Department of Neurointerventional Surgery Christiana Care Health System Newark Delaware USA;

    Sidney Kimmel Medical School Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA;

    Department of Neurointerventional Radiology St Jude Medical Center Fullerton USA;

    UC Irvine Health School of Medicine Irvine California USA;

    Department of Neurosurgery Drexel Neurosciences Institute Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA;

    Department of Neurosurgery Drexel Neurosciences Institute Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA;

    University of Massachusetts Radiology Worcester Massachusetts USA;

    Department of Radiology Riverside Radiology and Interventional Associates Inc Columbus Ohio USA;

    Department of Radiology Riverside Radiology and Interventional Associates Inc Columbus Ohio USA;

    Department of Neurointerventional Surgery Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute Miami Florida;

    Department of Neurointerventional Surgery Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute Miami Florida;

    Texas Stroke Institute Plano Texas USA;

    Department of Vascular and Interventional Neurology DePaul Stroke Center-SSM Neuroscience;

    Departments of Neurology and Interventional Radiology University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas;

    Department of Neurology St Louis University St Louis Missouri USA;

    Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery Los Robles Hospital and Medical Center Thousand Oaks;

    Department of Neurology Tulane University New Orleans Louisiana USA;

    Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair University of South Florida South Florida Florida USA;

    Department of Neurology Wayne State School of Medicine Detroit Michigan USA;

    Department of Neurosurgery Gundersen Health System La Crosse Wisconsin USA;

    Departments of Neurology Neurosurgery and Radiology Vanderbilt University Medical Center;

    John Muir Health California Walnut Creek USA;

    Departments of Radiology Neurology and Neurological Surgery Northwestern University Feinberg;

    Departments of Radiology Neurology and Neurotherapeutics UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas;

    Department of Neurology Boston University School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA;

    Departments of Endovascular Neurosurgery and Stroke St Vincent Mercy Medical Center Toledo Ohio;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 神经病学与精神病学;
  • 关键词

    stroke; thrombectomy; technique; balloon; catheter;

    机译:中风;血栓切除术;技术;气球;导管;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号