首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neuroimaging >Double-shot magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral lesions: fast spin-echo versus echo planar sequences.
【24h】

Double-shot magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral lesions: fast spin-echo versus echo planar sequences.

机译:脑病变的双射磁共振成像:快速旋转回波与回波平面序列。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The authors compared two new rapid MRI techniques: double-shot echo-planar imaging (DS-EPI) versus double-shot fast spin-echo (DS-FSE) in the evaluation of cerebral lesions. The authors examined 35 patients with 37 lesions, which were hyperintense on long TR images. Patients were scanned with both DS-EPI and DS-FSE with a time of repetition (TR) of 10,000 milliseconds and an echo time (TE) of 80 milliseconds. Conspicuity was determined from region of interest measurements to calculate contrast to noise ratio (C/N). Visual comparisons between DS-EPI and DS-FSE, and between DS-EPI and T2-weighted conventional spin-echo (CSE) were also performed to evaluate the sequences' ability to depict hemorrhage. The mean C/N for both sequences was comparable: 36.7 for DS-FSE and 35.6 for DS-EPI, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.77). With regards to depicting blood products, DS-EPI proved far more effective than DS-FSE and comparable to CSE. Also, DS-EPI proved to be more time-efficient, requiring 1.67 seconds per section, while DS-FSE required 3.33 seconds per section. Whereas DS-FSE and DS-EPI are comparable in their ability to depict hyperintense cerebral pathology, DS-EPI is more time-efficient, and therefore appears preferable. Because of the high magnetic susceptibility of DS-EPI, geometric distortion degrades visualization of lesions in the posterior fossa or near the sinuses. On the other hand, the high magnetic susceptibility results in high conspicuity of blood products.
机译:作者比较了两种新的快速MRI技术:双次回声平面成像(DS-EPI)与脑病变评估中的双击快速旋转回波(DS-FSE)。作者检查了37例患有37例病变的患者,在长期TR图像上是过高的。用DS-EPI和DS-FSE扫描患者,其中重复(TR)为10,000毫秒,回声时间(TE)为80毫秒。与利息区域测量的光临,以计算与噪声比对比度(C / N)。还进行DS-EPI和DS-FSE之间的视觉比较,以及DS-EPI和T2加权常规旋转回波(CSE)以评估序列描述出血的能力。两个序列的平均C / N可比较:36.7对于DS-FSE和DS-EPI的35.6,无统计学上显着差异(P = 0.77)。关于描绘血液产品,DS-EPI证明比DS-FSE更有效,与CSE相当。此外,DS-EPI经证明,每节要求1.67秒,而DS-FSE每节需要3.33秒。虽然DS-FSE和DS-EPI在其描绘过敏脑病变的能力中,但DS-EPI更效益,因此看起来优选。由于DS-EPI的高磁化率,几何变形降低了后部窝或脊柱附近的病变的可视化。另一方面,高磁化率导致血液产品的高端。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号