...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of managed care pharmacy : >Heartburn in consumer-directed health care and the cost outcomes of therapeutic maximum allowable cost.
【24h】

Heartburn in consumer-directed health care and the cost outcomes of therapeutic maximum allowable cost.

机译:消费者导向医疗保健的胃灼热和治疗最大允许费用的成本结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2005, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) launched its comparative effectiveness initiative with the goal of providing information to consumers and health care providers to assist in making more informed choices among treatment alternatives.1 AHRQ evaluated the treatments for heartburn (gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD]) in producing its first report on the comparative effectiveness of drugs.2 In the report dated December 13, 2005, AHRQ concluded that there was no difference in effectiveness in relieving the symptoms of GERD among the 5 proton pump inhibitors (PPIs: Aciphex, Nexium, Prevacid, Protonix, and omeprazole in its marketed forms, brand Prilosec, Prilosec OTC [over the counter], and generic [prescription only] omeprazole).
机译:2005年,医疗保健研究和质量(AHRQ)发起了比较有效性倡议,目的是向消费者和医疗保健提供者提供信息,以协助在处理替代方案中制定更明智的选择.1 AHRQ评估了胃灼热的治疗方法(胃食管 回流疾病[GERD])在2005年12月13日的报告中制定了关于药物比较有效性的第一份报告。AHRQ的结论是,在5个质子泵抑制剂中缓解GERD症状的有效性没有差异( PPI:aciphex,nexium,prevacid,protonix和omeprazole在其销售形式,品牌prilosec,prilosec otc [在柜台上],以及奥美拉唑的通用[处方])。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号