...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Insect Behavior >Solitary Floral Specialists Do Not Respond to Cryptic Flower-Occupying Predators
【24h】

Solitary Floral Specialists Do Not Respond to Cryptic Flower-Occupying Predators

机译:孤独的花卉专家没有回应神秘的花占用捕食者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The impacts of predators on bee foraging behavior are varied, but have been suggested to depend on both the type of predator (namely their hunting strategy) and also risk assessment by the prey (i.e., ability to perceive predators and learn to avoid them). However, nearly all studies have explored these impacts using social bees, despite the fact that solitary bees are extremely diverse, often specialized in their floral interactions, and may exhibit different behaviors in response to flower-occupying predators. In this study, we examined foraging behaviors of wild solitary long-horned bees (Melissodes spp.) in response to a cryptic predator, the ambush bug (Phymata americana) on the bees' primary floral host, the prairie sunflower (Helianthus petiolaris). We found sex-specific differences in foraging behaviors of bees, but little evidence that ambush bugs affected either pre-landing or post-landing foraging behaviors. Male bees visited flowers three times more often than females but female bees were five times more likely to land than males. Ambush bugs did not reduce visitation in either sex. Spectral analysis through a bee vision model indicated that ambush bug dorsal coloration was indistinguishable from the disc flowers of sunflowers, suggesting that ambush bugs are indeed cryptic and likely rarely detected by solitary bees. We discuss the implications of these findings for the perceived risk of predation in solitary bees and compare them to other studies of social bees.
机译:捕食者对蜜蜂觅食行为的影响是多样的,但已经提出依赖于捕食者的类型(即他们的狩猎策略)以及猎物的风险评估(即,能够感知掠夺者并学会避免他们)。然而,几乎所有研究都探讨了使用社会蜜蜂的这些影响,尽管孤独的蜜蜂非常多样化,通常专门从事他们的花卉互动,并且可能表现出不同的行为,以应对花卉捕食者。在这项研究中,我们检查了野生孤独的长角蜜蜂(Melissode SPP)的觅食行为,以回应蜜蜂的初级花卉主人,草原向日葵(Helianthus Petiolaris)的蜜蜂初级花卉主人的伏击虫(Phymata Americana)。我们在蜜蜂觅食行为的情况下,我们发现了性别特异性差异,但很少有证据表明伏击错误影响了预登陆或降落后的觅食行为。雄性蜜蜂比女性更频繁地参观了鲜花,但女性蜜蜂比男性更容易降落了五倍。伏击错误没有减少两种性别的探索。通过蜂视觉模型的光谱分析表明,伏击虫子背部着色是无法区分的向日葵的圆盘花,表明伏击错误确实是神秘的,并且可能很少被孤独的蜜蜂检测到。我们讨论了这些调查结果对孤独蜜蜂的捕食风险的影响,并将它们与其他社会蜂师的研究进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号