首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Intelligent Systems >Task Reallocating for Responding to Design Change in Complex Product Design
【24h】

Task Reallocating for Responding to Design Change in Complex Product Design

机译:重新分配任务,以响应复杂产品设计中的设计变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the real-world complex product design (CPD) process, task allocating is an ongoing reactive process where the presence of unexpected design change is usually inevitable. Therefore, reallocating is necessary to respond to design change positively as a procedure to repair the affected task plan. General reallocating literature addressed the reallocating versions with fixed executing time. In this paper, a multi-objective reallocation model is developed with a feasible assumption that the task executing time is controllable. To illustrate this idea, a compressing executing time strategy (CETS) is proposed in CPD process, where the executing time can be controlled with a non-linear compression cost. When design change occurs during the executing, task-resource reallocating is required to absorb the interference effects. Reallocating implies an increase in design cost and system instability; the proposed method CETS can address this issue effectively. CETS considers three objectives: completing time, stability, and change-adaptation cost. An adaptive multi-objective hybrid genetic algorithm and tabu search (AMOGATS) is developed to solve this mathematical method. The computational results of specific simulation examples verify the superiority. It shows that CETS is sensitive to design change, and the proposed algorithm AMOGATS can be effective to achieve the allocating by coordinating the objective consistency.
机译:在真实世界的复杂产品设计(CPD)过程中,任务分配是一个正在进行的反应过程,其中存在意外的设计变化通常是不可避免的。因此,重新分配是必要的响应设计变化作为修复受影响的任务计划的过程。一般重新分配文献解决了具有固定执行时间的重新分配版本。在本文中,开发了一种多目标重新分配模型,其可行假设是执行时间是可控的。为了说明这种思想,在CPD过程中提出了一种压缩执行时间策略(CETS),其中可以以非线性压缩成本控制执行时间。当在执行期间发生设计变更时,需要任务资源重新分配来吸收干扰效果。重新分配意味着设计成本和系统不稳定的增加;所提出的方法CET可以有效地解决这个问题。 CETS考虑了三个目标:完成时间,稳定性和改变适应性成本。开发了一种自适应多目标混合遗传遗传算法和禁忌搜索(AMOGATS)以解决该数学方法。特定模拟实施例的计算结果验证了优越性。它表明,CET对设计变更敏感,并且所提出的算法AMOGATS可以通过协调客观的一致性来实现分配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号