...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health services research & policy >From right place - Wrong person, to right place - Right person: Dignified care for older people
【24h】

From right place - Wrong person, to right place - Right person: Dignified care for older people

机译:从正确的地方 - 错误的人,到正确的地方 - 正确的人:对老年人的尊严照顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To examine: older people's and their relatives' views of dignified care; health care practitioners'behaviours and practices in relation to dignified care; the occupational, organizational and cultural factors that impact on care; and develop evidence-based recommendations for dignified care. Methods: An ethnography of four acute trusts in England and Wales involving semi-structured interviews with recently discharged older people (n = 40), their relatives (n = 25), frontline staff (n = 79) and Trust managers (n = 32), complemented by 617 hours of non-participant observation in 16 wards in NHS trusts. Results: 'Right Place - Wrong Person' refers to the staffs' belief that acute wards are not the 'right place' for older people. Wards were poorly-designed, confusing and inaccessible for older people; older people were bored through lack of communal spaces and activities and they expressed concern about the close proximity of patients of the opposite sex; staff were demoralised and ill-equipped with skills and knowledge to care for older people, and organizational priorities caused patients to be frequently moved within the system. In none of the wards studied was care either totally dignified or totally undignified. Variations occurred from ward to ward, in the same ward when different staff were on-duty and at different times of the day. Conclusions: The failure to provide dignified care is often a result of systemic and organizational factors rather than a failure of individual staff and it is these that must be addressed if dignified care is to be ensured.
机译:目标:检查:老年人和他们的亲戚对尊严的关怀观点;卫生保健从业者的攻击和实践与尊严的护理;对护理产生影响的职业,组织和文化因素;并制定基于证据的建议,以获得尊严的护理。方法:英格兰和威尔士四个急性信托的民族志,涉及半结构性访谈,最近被排放的老年人(n = 40),他们的亲属(n = 25),前线员工(n = 79)和信任经理(n = 32 ),在NHS信托的16个病房中辅成617小时的非参与者观察。结果:'正确的地方 - 错误的人是指工作人员的信念,即急救病房不是老年人的“正确的地方”。病房很糟糕,老年人令人困惑,令人困惑和无法进入;老年人通过缺乏公共空间和活动而无聊,他们对异性患者的密切接近感到担忧;工作人员被愚蠢,并赋予了表彰老年人的技能和知识,而组织优先事项导致患者经常在系统内移动。在没有学习的病房中,没有完全尊严或完全不核化。当不同的员工在当天的不同时间和不同时间在同一个病房中,在同一个病房中发生了变化。结论:未能提供尊严的护理通常是系统性和组织因素的结果,而不是个人工作人员的失败,这是必须解决的,如果要确保治疗尊严。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Cesagen School of Social Sciences Cardiff University 6 Museum Place Cardiff CF10 3BG United;

    Cesagen School of Social Sciences Cardiff University 6 Museum Place Cardiff CF10 3BG United;

    School of Social Policy Sociology and Social Research University of Kent Canterbury United;

    School of Social Policy Sociology and Social Research University of Kent Canterbury United;

    Cesagen School of Social Sciences Cardiff University 6 Museum Place Cardiff CF10 3BG United;

    School of Medicine Cardiff University University Hospital Llandough Cardiff United Kingdom;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号