首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hydrology, New Zealand >'Mean residence times and sources of Christchurch springs'
【24h】

'Mean residence times and sources of Christchurch springs'

机译:“基督城春天的卑鄙时间和来源”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Stewart et al. (2018) paper reports the results of groundwater geochemical and age tracer analyses for five Christchurch springs post the Mw 6.2 Christchurch Earthquake (22 February 2011). The importance of the papers content and the application of the methodology cannot be overstated for ongoing Christchurch Artesian System (CAS) groundwater monitoring and input into the Environment Canterbury groundwater management plan. The provenances and tritium analyses of two of the Stewart et al. (2018) sampled springs are particularly important - WL wetland reserve, Woolston and SB Sandbar spring, McCormacks Bay located adjacent to and within the Avon-Heathcote Estuary, south-east Christchurch at the Canterbury Plains-Port Hills margin. Fringe Banks Peninsula springs at Ferrymead and Mount Pleasant, sourced from volcanic rock groundwater, have been known long-term (Brown and Weeber, 1994) but not CAS-sourced artesian springs. If WL and SB are artesian springs they are the first totally CAS coastal artesian springs to have been identified at Christchurch. To date for the Christchurch coastal plains sector all springs are derived from near surface Waimakariri River gravel channels, rain and drainage water. The mean residence times estimated from tritium (TU) were 150 years for WL and >180 years for SB, showing accordance of age with CAS-sourced groundwater. The paper lacks geological input as to Christchurch subsurface stratigraphy and site-specific hydrogeology descriptions for the springs. When these are considered for one of the sampled spring sites there is a distinct possibility that the sample was derived from a leaking abandoned well rather than an artesian spring. Photographs of the springs would have enhanced the paper.
机译:Stewart等人。 (2018)纸张报告地球化学和年龄跟踪器分析的地下水地球化学和年龄示踪分析员工MW 6.2基督城地震(2011年2月22日)。论文内容的重要性和方法的应用不能夸大基督城艺术系统(CAS)地下水监测和投入环境坎特伯雷地下水管理计划。斯图尔特等人的杂种和氚分析。 (2018)采样泉水尤为重要 - WL湿地储备,伍尔斯顿和SB沙巴春天,麦克斯顿湾毗邻坎特伯雷平原港口山地边缘的东南基督城。 Fringe Banks Peninsula Springs在Forrymead和Mount Pleasant,来自火山岩地下水,已知长期(棕色和Weeber,1994),但不是Cas-Sourced Artesian Springs。如果WL和SB是Artesian Springs,他们是第一个在基督城识别的全体CAS沿海艺术斯普林斯。迄今为止,克赖斯特彻奇沿海平原部门所有斯普林斯均来自靠近近地表Waimakariri河砾石渠道,雨水和排水水。从氚(TU)估计的平均停留时间为WL和SB的> 180年的150岁,表现出CAS-源地下水的年龄。本文缺乏基督城地下地层地层和特定于泉水地质描述的地质投入。当这些被认为是一个采样的弹簧部位时,存在从泄漏的漏井而不是艺术春天来源的不同可能性。弹簧的照片将增强纸张。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号