首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging >Post-mortem computed tomography compared to medico-legal autopsy -pathologies in the torso and limbs
【24h】

Post-mortem computed tomography compared to medico-legal autopsy -pathologies in the torso and limbs

机译:后验尸计算断层扫描与躯干和四肢中的Medico尸检 - 嗜睡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) has become a routine part of post-mortem forensic evaluation in many institutes worldwide. Its added benefit to the traditional autopsy is indisputable, but its ability to detect different findings compared to those found in an autopsy has only been evaluated in a limited number of large scale studies. Methods: In this retrospective study, we assessed the agreement between autopsy and PMCT, and their ability to detect pathological findings (by "Kappa" and "McNemar" scores, respectively), using all finding of both methods as reference standard. We included findings in the torso and the limbs extracted from autopsy and PMCT reports of 105 consecutive cases. Results: The level of agreement between autopsy and PMCT depends on the tissues, locations, and type of pathologies examined. Autopsy much better demonstrates bullet tracks (68/76 vs. 18/76, p < 0.01) and stab wounds (22/25 vs. 11/25, p = 0.013), while PMCT is more sensitive to shrapnel (86/121 vs. 37/121, p < 0.001). PMCT better demonstrates fractures (259/344 vs. 222/344, p = 0.012), especially in bones that are hard to access in autopsy, but is less sensitive to rib fractures (137/177 vs. 115/177, p = 0.037). Parenchymal organ pathologies are not well demonstrated by PMCT (194/257 vs. 117/257, p = < 0.001). Conclusions: Shrapnel, foreign bodies, gas-related pathologies, pelvic fluid and fractures, excluding rib fractures, are detected more often by post-mortem CT. It is important to consider PMCT as a tool in the evaluation of specific tissues and organs, possibly providing solid answers, or at least directing the team in the performance of the autopsy.
机译:简介:验尸后计算断层扫描(PMCT)已成为全球许多机构验尸法评估的常规部分。它对传统尸检的增加的益处是无可争议的,但是它与尸检中发现的那些检测不同发现的能力只在有限数量的大规模研究中被评估。方法:在此回顾性研究中,我们评估了尸检和PMCT之间的协议,以及他们检测病理发现(通过“Kappa”和“McNemar”得分的能力,使用两种方法作为参考标准。我们包括躯干和肢体中的调查结果,从尸检和PMCT报告中提取了105个案例。结果:尸检和PMCT之间的一致性依赖于检查的组织,位置和类型的病理学。尸检更好地展示子弹轨道(68/76对18/76,P <0.01)和刺伤(22/25 vs.11/25,P = 0.013),而PMCT对弹片更敏感(86/121 VS 。37/121,p <0.001)。 PMCT更好地证明了骨折(259/344与222/344,P = 0.012),尤其是难以进入尸检的骨骼,但对肋骨骨折不太敏感(137/177与115/177,P = 0.037 )。实质器官病理不适用于PMCT(194/257对117/257,P = <0.001)。结论:在验验中,更常用于肋骨骨折,不包括肋骨骨折的弹片,异物,气体病态,盆腔液和骨折,均经常检测到肋骨骨折。重要的是要将PMCT视为评估特定组织和器官的工具,可能提供固体答案,或者至少指导团队在尸检的表现中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号