首页> 外文期刊>American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias >Comparing responses to horticultural-based and traditional activities in dementia care programs.
【24h】

Comparing responses to horticultural-based and traditional activities in dementia care programs.

机译:比较痴呆症护理计划中对园艺活动和传统活动的反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Engaging persons with dementia in meaningful activities supports well-being; however, care staff are challenged to implement age- and ability-appropriate activities in a group setting. We compared a randomly assigned treatment group, who received horticultural therapy-based (HT-based) programming to a comparison group, who engaged in traditional activities (TA) programming, on engagement and affect. Horticultural therapy-based programming was implemented twice weekly at 4 treatment sites for 6 weeks, while regular TA were observed at comparison sites. Results revealed no differences between groups on affective domains. Levels of adaptive behavior differed between the groups, with the treatment group demonstrating higher levels of active, passive, and other engagement and the comparison group demonstrating higher levels of self-engagement. Our results highlight the value of HT-based programs and the importance of simultaneously capturing participants' affective and behavioral responses. Theoretical and practical considerations about the facilitation of and context in which the programming occurs are discussed.
机译:让痴呆症患者从事有意义的活动有助于福祉;但是,护理人员面临着在小组环境中开展适合年龄和能力的活动的挑战。我们将接受园艺疗法(HT)编程的随机分配治疗组与参与传统活动(TA)编程,参与度和影响力的对照组进行比较。每周两次在4个治疗地点实施基于园艺疗法的程序设计,持续6周,而在比较地点则观察到常规TA。结果显示在情感领域上两组之间没有差异。各组之间的适应行为水平不同,治疗组表现出较高的主动,被动和其他参与水平,而比较组则表现出较高的自我参与水平。我们的结果突出了基于HT的程序的价值以及同时捕捉参与者的情感和行为反应的重要性。讨论了有关促进编程发生的环境的理论和实践考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号